KINGS: 
        DAVID (1055-1015 BC) AND SOLOMON (970-931 BC) 
        
         
          
        THE king
            who was placed at the head of the people through their own eager insistence, and
            with the unwilling consent of the prophet proved, more effectually than any
            objections could do, how little a monarchical constitution was fitted to
            realise the expectations founded on it; for the king, until his accession a
            simple and excellent man, with no thoughts of ambition or arbitrary power, did
        not shrink from cruelty and inhumanity in order to assert his dignity. 
        By
          the aid of prophetic guidance, care was taken that he should not resemble the
          repulsive prototype drawn by Samuel, or become so independent as to place
          himself above all laws and rules, but that he should ever remain mindful of his
          lowly origin. Samuel did not select a king from the haughty tribe of Ephraim,
          lest he should, act like Abimelech, who, in his presumption and ambition, had
          killed his own brothers, and laid waste whole districts; but the king was
          chosen from the smallest of the tribes, the tribe of Benjamin. His family, that
          of Matri, was one of the lowliest in Benjamin. His father, Kish, was not in any
          way distinguished; he was a simple countryman; and nothing could be said in
          his praise, except that he was an upright man. Saul was chosen because he was
          content to work at his plough, and watch the increase of his father’s flocks.
          He had no thought beyond the village in which he was born, and barely an idea
          that there were human beings to whom the possession of power was an attraction.
          In his shyness he displayed the ways of a true peasant; these circumstances,
          and the personal qualities of Saul seemed to be a security against any
          presumption or pride on the part of the first king of Israel.
          
          
            
           
        The
          circumstances attending the choice of a king left a deep and pleasing
          impression. “See”, said Samuel, “this is the man whom God has chosen as king;
          his like is not to be found in all Israel”. Most of the bystanders, carried
          away by the solemn proceeding and by Saul’s appearance, shouted, “Long live the
          king!” Samuel then anointed the newly elected king with holy oil, by which he
          was believed to be rendered inviolable. The elders rejoiced that their
          heartfelt wish of having a king to rule over them was at length realised. They
          looked forward to happy days. This choice of a king was an important epoch in
          the history of the Jewish people; it determined their entire future. Yet during
          the joyful and solemn proceedings, discord had already arisen. Some discontented
          people, probably Ephraimites, who had hoped to have a king chosen from their
          own ranks, loudly expressed their disappointment. “How can this man help us!”.
          Whilst all the other elders, according to universal custom, brought the king
          gifts of homage, and a few of the most courageous followed him to Gibeah to
          assist him against the enemies of Israel, the malcontents kept apart and
          refused their allegiance.
          
          
            
           
        Saul’s
          courage, after his elevation to the throne, must have increased greatly, or he
          must have felt himself guided by God after his unexpected elevation. He now
          boldly confronted the task of opposing his mighty enemies, and of settling the
          disorganised affairs of the commonwealth. The position of the people at his
          accession was very sad and humiliating, almost worse than in the days of the
          Judges. Their arms, such as bows and arrows, swords, etc., had been carried off
          by the victorious Philistines, who left no smith in the land to make new
          weapons. The newly elected king lacked a sword,—that symbol of royalty among
          all nations and at all times. His election was probably conducted so secretly
          that the Philistines knew nothing of it. The Philistine tax-gatherers exhausted
          the strength of the country, and at the same time repressed every attempt at
          revolt. So greatly were the Israelites humbled that some of them had to
          accompany the Philistines on expeditions against their own brethren. Nought but
          a miraculous event could have saved them, and such an event was brought about
          by Saul with his son and kinsmen.
          
          
            
           
        Saul’s
          eldest son, Jonathan, was perhaps worthier of the kingly dignity than his
          father. Modest and unselfish perhaps to a greater extent even than his father,
          courageous in the very face of death, he combined with these qualities an
          almost excessive kindliness and gentleness,—a feature which endeared him to
          all, but which would have been a serious failing in a ruler who had to display
          a certain amount of firmness and severity. Jonathan was, besides, endowed with
          an enthusiastic nature which appealed to every heart. He was truthful, and an
          enemy to all deceit; he uttered his opinions freely, at the risk of
          displeasing, or of losing his position and even his life, all of which
          qualities made him a favourite with the people. Abner, the cousin of Saul, was
          of an entirely different disposition; he was a warrior of unbending firmness,
          and possessed a considerable degree of artfulness. To the inexperienced king
          and the people he, too, rendered important service in their distress.
          Surrounded by these and other faithful adherents of his family, and by the
          tribe of Benjamin in general, who were proud to gain importance through him,
          Saul set forth on the unequal contest with the Philistines. Jonathan commenced
          hostilities. In the town of Geba, or Gibeah of Benjamin, lived the Philistine
          tax-gatherers, surrounded by a host of warriors. Jonathan attacked this post
          and killed the garrison. This was the first declaration of war; it was made at
          Saul's command and with his full approval. The king now ordered that the trumpet-blast,
          announcing that the war with the Philistines had commenced, should sound
          throughout the land of Benjamin. Many heard the news with joy, others with
          sadness and dismay.
                
          
            
           
        All
          who had courage assembled in order to stand by their king, determined to aid
          him in casting off the disgrace of Israel, or to perish in the attempt. Those
          who were cowards escaped to the opposite side of the Jordan, or hid in caverns,
          in clefts of the rocks, or in subterranean passages. A feeling of intense
          anxiety filled all minds as to the result of the contest. The meeting-place of
          the Israelites was then in Gilgal, the town most remote from the land of the
          Philistines. This place of meeting had been appointed by the prophet Samuel. He
          had directed Saul to repair thither, and stay there seven days to await his
          arrival and further instructions. Gilgal probably contained the choir of
          musicians and prophets, whose psalms and songs were to inspire the Israelite
          warriors with martial courage and with trust in the deliverance of their
          fatherland. Meanwhile the Philistines prepared themselves for a war of
          extermination against the Israelites. The news of Jonathan’s attack on their
          outposts had exasperated them; they were, however, more surprised than
          terrified. How could the cowardly, weaponless, unarmed Israelites dare to
          attack the Philistines, their masters? A numerous band of warriors, supported
          by cavalry, passed through the valleys of the southern mountain-range of
          Ephraim, and through the entire breadth of the land as far as Michmash; from
          this camping-place they spread their marauding bands in three directions, the
          most humiliating circumstance being that many Israelites were compelled to
          assist the Philistines in subduing their own tribesmen.
          
          
            
           
        This
          was a critical time for the people of Israel. Whilst the Philistines were
          gradually pushing forward to Michmash, Saul, surrounded by the brave men of his
          tribe, awaited in Gilgal the prophet who was to give the warriors his inspired
          directions, and thus endow them with courage. But day after day passed and
          Samuel did not appear. Every hour spent in idleness seemed to destroy the
          chance of a successful issue. Saul feared that the enemy would descend from the
          mountains into the valley, attack Gilgal, and destroy or put to flight the
          small body of Israelites. Not a few of his soldiers had already deserted,
          looking on Samuel's absence as an inauspicious omen. Saul, becoming impatient,
          determined on the seventh day to attack the enemy on his own responsibility.
          According to ancient practice, he made a sacrifice in order to propitiate the
          Deity, and to ensure his success in the battle. Just as he was preparing the
          burnt-offering, Samuel suddenly appeared, and upbraided the king severely for
          being carried away by impatience. He resented this error with great austerity,
          departed from Gilgal, and left Saul to his own resources—a hard blow for him,
          as he had reckoned confidently on the prophet's assistance at this dangerous
          juncture. After Samuel had departed from Gilgal, Saul found it useless to
          remain there. He therefore repaired with the remnant of his troops to Gibeah.
          On reviewing his soldiers here, he found them to amount to not more than six
          hundred. It is not surprising that Saul and Jonathan became dispirited at the
          sight of this slight force, which was unarmed and had to fight the
          well-appointed armies of the enemy. Saul and Jonathan alone possessed swords.
          It was indeed a sad honey-moon for the young kingdom. The most painful blow for
          Saul was that, through Samuel’s absence, he was deprived of the means by which
          the people might ascertain the will of God.
          
          
            
           
        Jonathan,
          however, made a good beginning at Gibeah, where Saul and his troops lay
          encamped, at scarce an hour's distance from Michmash, the site of the
          Philistine camp. Between the two armies lay a valley, but the road which led
          from one place to the other was impracticable, the valley being bordered by
          steep, almost perpendicular walls of rocks and precipices, which closed it up
          on the east till it became a mere gorge of about ten feet in width. On the west
          side, where the valley formed a wide pass, the Philistines had stationed their
          outposts. Thus the Philistines and Israelites could only come to an encounter
          in the narrow path. At last Jonathan determined to ascend the steepest part of
          the pass, and, accompanied by his sword-bearer, he climbed, on hands and feet,
          up the steep sharp points of the rock on the side of Michmash. One false step
          would have precipitated him into the depth, but happily he and his man arrived
          safely at the highest point. When the Philistines beheld them, they were not a
          little surprised that, on this rocky road, a path had been found to their camp.
          Deceived by this ruse, and fearing that other Israelites would follow, they
          called out scornfully, “Look at the Hebrews, they are crawling out of their
          hiding-places; come higher up, we wish to become better acquainted with
          you”.   It had been previously agreed between Jonathan and his
          sword-bearer that, should they receive such a challenge, they would press on
          and bravely commence the attack. The Philistines who first beheld the daring climbers,
          soon left off scoffing, for twenty men were killed at the first attack with
          pieces of rock and sling-stones. The Benjamites were very skilful in the use of
          the sling, and Jonathan and his sword-bearer advanced further, and continued
          hurling masses of rock at the Philistines. Terror-stricken by this sudden
          attack from a side where approach had seemed impossible, they could only
          imagine themselves attacked by supernatural beings, and, seized with fear, they
          fought each other, or broke the ranks in the wildest confusion. Saul, who was
          watching from a high eminence, no sooner perceived the enemy beginning to flee
          than he hurried to the scene of action, followed by his six hundred warriors,
          and completed the defeat of the Philistines. Those Israelites who had until
          then been compelled by the Philistines to fight against their own brethren
          turned their arms against their oppressors. Others who had hidden themselves in
          the clefts and grottoes of the mountains of Ephraim took courage, when they
          witnessed the flight of the Philistines, and swelled the ranks of the
          aggressors. Saul’s troops, thus increased, numbered ten thousand. In every town
          of Mount Ephraim through which the Philistines passed in their flight, they
          were attacked by the inhabitants, and cut down one by one. Though tired and
          exhausted, Saul’s troops pursued the retreating foe for eight hours.
          
          
            
             
        An
          occurrence of apparently slight consequence, but which proved to be of great
          importance, put a stop to further pursuit. Saul had impressed on his soldiers
          that the destruction of their enemy was not to be interrupted even for food or
          refreshment, and he pronounced a curse on him who should take the slightest
          nourishment. Jonathan, who was always foremost, had heard nothing of this
          curse. Exhausted by the long fight and pursuit he could not restrain himself,
          and tasted wild honey into which he had dipped his staff. When his attention
          was drawn to his father's peremptory command, he openly avowed his act. Saul,
          however, made a serious matter of it, and determined to condemn Jonathan to
          death. But the people protested vehemently. “What!” cried the warriors, “shall
          Jonathan, to whom the people owes its great victory, be killed? No, not a hair
          of his head shall be touched”. The people offered a sin-offering for Jonathan,
          and thus released him from death. Through this episode, the pursuit of the
          Philistines to the west of Ajalon was suspended. Great was the joy of the
          Israelites at the victory they had so unexpectedly obtained. The battle of
          Michmash fully restored their reputation. They also had regained their weapons,
          and felt strong enough to fight under a king whose firmness of resolve they had
          experienced. But Saul returned humbly and modestly to his dwelling place in
          Gibeah, and ploughed, as heretofore, his father’s fields. He was not yet
          blinded by his new dignity. Meanwhile the hostilities of the Ammonites against
          the tribes on the other side of the Jordan had increased. Nahash, king of the
          Ammonites, besieged the fortress of Jabesh-Gilead. The inhabitants were unable
          to hold out for long, and negotiated with Nahash about a capitulation. He
          offered a hard, inhuman condition to the Gileadites of Jabesh. As a disgrace to
          Israel, all men should consent to lose their right eye. What were the
          Gileadites to do? They treated for a delay of seven days in order to send
          messages to their fellow-tribesmen. When Saul was one day returning home with
          his yoke of bullocks from the field, he met the inhabitants of Gibeah in great
          excitement and bathed in tears. Astonished at this, he asked the cause of their
          grief, and the messengers from Jabesh-Gilead related what would befall their
          town if speedy assistance were not at hand. Incensed at the disgraceful
          condition imposed by the king of the Ammonites, Saul immediately determined to
          bring aid to the Gileadites of Jabesh. For the first time he exercised his
          royal prerogative by summoning all Israel to take part in the campaign against
          the Ammonites.
                
          
            
             
        Samuel
          supported this summons by declaring that he too would join in the expedition.
          By Saul’s command all the warriors assembled at the meeting-place. The anarchy
          of the era of the Judges was now at an end, and a stern will ruled. A large
          body of Israelites crossed the Jordan; the Ammonites, attacked on the south,
          north, and west, fled in all directions, and no two of them remained together.
          The people of Jabesh were saved, and ever after displayed the deepest gratitude
          to Saul and his house for the help so quickly and energetically rendered to
          them. On his recrossing the Jordan, after his second victory over the enemy,
          Saul was greeted with tumultuous joy. Samuel, who was a witness to these expressions
          of delight, thought it wise to remind the king and his people that their
          triumph should not turn into pride, and that they should not consider the
          kingly dignity as an end, but only as a means. He therefore summoned a large
          gathering of the Israelites, and determined to call the king’s and the people’s
          attention to their duties. Samuel again anointed Saul as king; the people
          renewed their homage, and made joyful offerings.
                
          
            
             
        In
          the midst of these rejoicings Samuel delivered an address, which bears
          testimony to the powers of his mind and to his greatness as a prophet.
          
          
            
             
        Saul’s
          two important victories, and the assemblage at Gilgal, where homage had been
          rendered to him by nearly all the tribes, confirmed his power, and the royal
          dominion was placed on a permanent basis. Although Samuel praised and extolled
          the days of the Judges, yet the people felt that it could better appreciate a
          king than a hero-judge. The nation willingly exchanged its republican liberty
          for the prize of unity and the power obtained thereby. The kingly estate led to
          various changes. Saul had to employ responsible men for the execution of his
          commands; he required a number of officers and servants. Officers of war were
          appointed to rule over hundreds and thousands respectively, and councillors,
          who were admitted to the king’s table. A special band of men served as runner, an armed
            force who became the obedient instruments of the king’s will. These and their
            chief formed the king’s, court. Saul’s leader of the guard was named Doag, an
            Idumaean by birth. Owing to the presence of the standing army and attendants,
            Gibeah, till then only a small town, now became the capital. Towards Samuel,
            Saul at first showed submission. When the prophet, in the name of God,
            commanded him to declare war to the death with the Amalekites, Saul immediately
            made preparations, and summoned his warriors. The Amalekites were the implacable
            and hereditary enemies of the Israelites, and had displayed the greatest
            cruelty towards them during their wanderings in the desert, and on their entry
            into the Holy Land. These enemies often joined other nations in order to crush
            the Israelites. The Amalekite king Agag appears to have caused great trouble to
            the tribe of Judah in the days of Saul.
            
            
              
                 
        It
          was, however, no light task to undertake hostilities against the Amalekites.
          Agag was considered a great hero, and inspired all around him with fear; but
          although the Amalekites were renowned for their courage and power, Saul did not
          hesitate to prepare for this hazardous campaign. He appears to have carried on
          the strife with skill and courage, and to have drawn the enemy into an ambush,
          by which he was enabled to obtain a complete victory. He took the capital
          (possibly Kadesh), killed the men, women and children, and captured the dreaded
          king Agag. Only a few of the people who escaped with their lives took refuge in
          the great neighbouring desert which leads to Egypt. The Israelite warriors
          carried off rich booty, including flocks of sheep, herds of cattle, and camels.
          According to Samuel’s command, this spoil was to be destroyed, so that every
          trace of the memory of Amalek might be lost. The soldiers, however, did not
          wish this rich spoil to be given up to destruction. Saul, ordinarily so rigid
          in his discipline, permitted the preservation of the booty, and thus
          transgressed the prophet’s directions. Saul was very proud of his victory over
          the dreaded Amalekites, and he caused the king Agag to be led in chains as a
          living sign of triumph. His success in battle intoxicated him, and caused him
          to forget his former humility. On his return he erected a monument of his
          victory in the oasis of Carmel. Meanwhile, Samuel, in a prophetic vision, had
          learned that the king had not fulfilled the instructions given him, and was
          therefore to be punished.
          
          
          
               
        Samuel
          had to announce this to the victorious king; but the task was difficult, and he
          struggled and prayed a whole night. At last he determined to proceed to meet
          Saul. But hearing on the way that Saul was so dominated by pride as to cause a
          monument to be raised, he turned back and repaired to Gilgal. When Saul heard
          of this journey, he followed him thither. The elders of Benjamin and the
          neighbouring tribes also proceeded to Gilgal to salute the victorious king.
          Here they were witnesses to a strife which foreboded evil times.
                
          
          
                 
        As
          though nothing had occurred, the king met the prophet with these words, “I have
          fulfilled God’s commands”. On which Samuel sternly replied to him, “What is the
          meaning of the bleating of the sheep which I hear?”. “It was the people”,
          answered Saul, “who spared the best of the sheep and the oxen, in order to
          sacrifice them on the altar at Gilgal”. At these words the prophet Samuel could
          no longer repress his anger, and he replied in winged words: “Hath the Lord as
          great delight in burnt-offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying His voice?
          Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken, than the fat of rams.
          For the sin of witchcraft comes from rebellion, and the iniquity of Teraphim
          from stubbornness. Because thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, He hath
          also rejected thee from being king”.
          
          
          
                   
        Saul was
          so deeply humiliated by these words and by the stern and austere attitude which
          the prophet adopted that he confessed his fault and, in the effort to prevent
          him from going away, he seized Samuel’s robe so firmly that it was torn. Samuel
          then said, “This is a sign: God will tear thy kingly dignity from thee and will
          give it to a better man, even though Israel be torn asunder in the act”. Once
          more Saul entreated the prophet. “At least honour me now before the elders of
          my tribe and of Israel, and return with me”.
          
           
        In
          consideration of this entreaty, Samuel accompanied him to the altar, where the
          king humbled himself before God. Samuel then ordered that the fettered king
          Agag should be led forth. The Amalekite king exclaimed in his fear, “Oh! how
          bitter, how bitter is death!”. To this exclamation Samuel replied, “As thy
          sword hath made women childless, so shall thy mother be childless among women”,
          and Samuel hewed Agag in pieces before the king in Gilgal.
          
         
        After
          this scene in Gilgal, the king and the prophet avoided each other. The victory
          which Saul obtained over Amalek was a defeat for him—his pride was crushed. The
          announcement that God had abandoned him threw a dark shadow over his soul. His
          gloom, which later on developed into madness, owed its rise to the threatening
          words of Samuel, God will give the kingdom of Israel to a better man. These
          terrible words were ever ringing in Saul's ears. Just as he had at first hesitated
          to accept the reins of government, so he was now unwilling to let them pass
          from his hands. At the same time he felt himself helpless. What could he do
          against the severity of the prophet? In order to divert himself, he plunged
          into warfare. There were many enemies on the borders of Israel whom he wished
          to subdue. He also pursued another course in order to impress the people with a
          sense of his importance.
                
          
            
               
        There
          still lived amongst the Israelites a few Canaanite families and small clans who
          had not been expelled when the country was conquered, and could not be ejected
          now. These had led the Israelites to honour false gods, and to indulge in
          idolatrous errors. Saul therefore thought that he would greatly benefit the
          nation, and serve the law of Israel, if he removed these idolatrous neighbours,
          and everything that was foreign. Among the strangers who had been suffered to
          remain were the men of Gibeon, they having voluntarily submitted to the
          conquering Israelites. Saul did not respect the oath given to the Gibeonites,
          but ordered a wholesale massacre amongst them, from which but few escaped.
          
          
          
               
        Together
          with the foreign Canaanite nations he also persecuted the sorcerers who took
          part in idolatrous practices. Whilst Saul, on the one hand, endeavoured to
          acquire the good will of his people, and showed himself the severe champion of
          the laws given by God, he tried, on the other hand, to impress the nation with
          submissive dread of the kingly power. He wore a golden crown on his head, as a
          sign of greatness and exaltation above the masses. His contemporaries, who had
          known him as a plough-man, and might have been inclined to treat him as their
          equal, were to forget his past and become accustomed to gaze at him with awe as
          the anointed wearer of the holy crown. Saul also indulged in the royal luxury
          of polygamy. He took wives in addition to his first wife Ahinoam, whom he had
          married when he was still a peasant. Among them was the beautiful and
          courageous Rizpah.
          
          
          
                 
        Saul
          showed much energy in his raids against the enemy and, no doubt in order to
          dissipate the fears aroused by the prophet’s harsh words, displayed great pomp
          and ostentation, until then foreign to his nature. But sooner than he had
          anticipated, the evil spirit of his imagination took form in the shape of a
          youth that charmed him despite himself.
          
          
          
                   
        It
          happened during one of the frequent fights with the enemy that Saul's troops
          were drawn up in martial array against the Philistines, and the two armies
          stood face to face, separated from each other only by a deep ravine. Both were
          fearful of taking the first decisive step. At length the Philistines made the
          proposal that the battle should be settled by single combat, and they sent
          forth as their champion the gigantic warrior Goliath. King Saul would gladly
          have seen one of his army go forth to the duel, and he promised the victor rich
          presents, exemption from taxes, freedom from compulsory, service, and the hand
          of one of his daughters. But not even at such a price did any one of the
          Israelite army dare to oppose himself to Goliath. Then, as if by chance, a
          shepherd boy of Bethlehem, a town near to the field of battle, presented
          himself, and brought about a decisive issue.
          
          
          
                     
        This
          shepherd of Bethlehem, directly or indirectly, was the cause of a revolution in
          the history of Israel, and in the history of the human race. David, then known
          only to the inhabitants of the village or town of Bethlehem, has since become a
          celebrated name throughout the world. After his disagreement with Saul, Samuel
          had received the prophetic mission to repair to Bethlehem in order to anoint
          the future king of Israel from amongst the eight sons of the aged Jesse as
          successor to Saul. Samuel set out in secret, lest he should be pursued by the
          king. The prophet selected David as the future king chosen by God, and anointed
          him as king of Israel in the presence of his brothers. This simple but
          important act was naturally performed in privacy, and was kept secret by
          David’s father and brothers.
                
          
          
                       
        Jesse,
          the father of David, was not descended from a distinguished house of Judah,
          but, like all the inhabitants of Bethlehem, belonged to a very humble family.
          David was about eighteen years old when he was anointed, and was not
          distinguished either by his experience or by any deed. The beautiful
          pasture-land round about Bethlehem had till then composed his world. But
          faculties lay dormant in him which only needed to be aroused to make him excel
          his contemporaries intellectually as Saul surpassed them physically. David was
          pre-eminently gifted with poetic and musical talent, and whilst he yet tended
          his, flock, his harp awakened the echoes of the mountains. A single
          circumstance, however, sufficed to change this youth into a man.
          
          
          
                         
        Samuel
          returned to Ramah as secretly as he had left; but he kept an eye on the youth
          whom he had anointed, and drew him into the circle of his disciples. Here
          David’s poetic talents were developed. Here he was able to perfect himself in
          the use of musical instruments. But he learnt something more in Samuel's
          surroundings; he learnt “to know God”. His spirit was pervaded with the Divine
          presence, and became instinct with that piety which refers all things to God,
          and submits in all things to Divine guidance. This reliance on God had been
          awakened and strengthened in him by the influence of Samuel. David frequently
          journeyed from Bethlehem to Ramah, and from Samuel’s house to the flocks of his
          father. The noble courage, with which his anointment and the influence of
          Samuel inspired him, did not desert him when he tended his flocks in the
          meadows of Bethlehem. When war with the Philistines broke out, in the
          neighbourhood of Bethlehem, David could no longer remain a shepherd of his
          flocks, and he gladly undertook to deliver a message to his brothers who were
          serving in the army, so as to have an excuse for entering the camp. On his
          arrival there, he timidly told the bystanders that he was willing to risk an
          encounter with the blaspheming Philistine that reviled the army of the living
          God. The news soon reached the king’s ears that a youth had offered himself for
          the combat. Half convinced, half in scorn, Saul gave him permission to engage
          in the duel, and offered him his own armour. The first stone, cast with his skilled
          hand from the sling, struck the heavily-armed giant from afar; he fell to the
          ground. David threw himself upon Goliath, drew the sword out of the scabbard,
          and cut off the giant's head. The Philistines, from the hilltops, had witnessed
          the fall of their champion, whom they had thought invincible; they declared
          themselves conquered, and no longer sought to prolong the war, but fled to
          their fastnesses. The troops of Israel, on the other hand, carried away by
          David’s victory, followed their enemy in hot pursuit.
                
          
          
                           
        Holding
          the bleeding head in his hand, the youthful victor was led before Saul, to
          whom he had till then been unknown. He had not the remotest suspicion that this
          youth, from whom he could not withhold his admiration, might become a dreaded
          rival. He felt great joy at the signal victory. His son Jonathan, who had an
          open, tender and unselfish heart, was enchanted with the young victor. His love
          and attachment for David became stronger than man’s love for woman. The fame of
          David’s name and the victory he had obtained in Ephes-Damim soon resounded
          throughout the valley of Terebinths, and in the territories of all the tribes.
          David, however, returned to his father's house as though nothing had happened,
          and merely took Goliath’s shield and armour with him as memorials. But he did
          not long remain at home. The destiny of Saul had begun to be fulfilled, and
          David was its chosen instrument. The gloom of dejection, which had obscured the
          soul of the king since his breach with the prophet, became still darker. His ill-humour
          deepened into sadness and melancholy, and sometimes paroxysms of wild madness
          took hold of him. “An evil spirit hath entered the king”, his servants
          whispered to each other. Instrumental music alone was capable of rousing him;
          his faithful servants therefore proposed that a skilled musician and poet
          should come to the court, and they advised him to select the son of Jesse, who
          was handsome, brave, eloquent, and a harpist. David came, and his musical
          talent, as well as his general bearing, delighted the king. Whenever Saul fell
          into melancholy, David touched the harp, and the king was relieved from his
          depression. Saul felt himself enchained by David. He began to consider him as a
          son, and at length entreated David’s father to leave him permanently at court.
          Saul appointed him his armour-bearer, thus securing to himself the cheering
          influence of his presence. This was the first step towards David’s rise. But
          not only was the king attracted by him, David exercised an influence over the
          entire court, and all hearts turned towards him. Jonathan, however, loved him
          best of all. Saul’s second daughter, Michal, was also secretly devoted to him.
          At the court, David learnt the use of weapons, and exchanged the harp for the
          sword. As he was full of courage, he soon distinguished himself in the small
          frays in which he took part, and came off victorious and successful. On one
          occasion, when David had inflicted a signal defeat on the Philistines, and when
          there were great rejoicings throughout the Israelite territory, the women and
          maidens of the various cities which he traversed on his return came forth to
          meet him with songs, timbrels and cymbals, dancing around him, and joyfully
          proclaiming him victor, saying: “Saul has killed his thousands, but David his
          tens of thousands”. These honours, unanimously and enthusiastically offered to
          the youthful hero, at length opened Saul’s eyes. This was “the better man”, the
          one whom God had chosen as king over Israel; the rival with whom Samuel had
          threatened him, whom he dreaded so greatly, but who had hitherto only appeared
          to him as a visionary being, was now actually before him in the person of his
          own favourite and that of his people.
                
          
          
                           
        It
          was a terrible disillusion for Saul. “To me they give but thousands, and to him
          tens of thousands—they place him above me. What is yet wanting to make him
          king?”. The joyous shouts of the singing and dancing choruses of women rang in
          his ears from that time, and brought to mind the words of the prophet: “You are
          deserted of God”. Saul’s love for David now changed to bitter hate, which soon
          turned to madness.
          
          
          
                           
        On
          the very day succeeding David’s return from his triumphal procession, Saul was
          seized with frenzy, and twice hurled a spear at David, who skilfully avoided
          the thrust. When the mad fit had left Saul, the failure of this attempt seemed
          to him a proof that God was protecting his enemy. From that time he sought to
          destroy his rival by stratagem. He pretended to honour David; made him the
          leader of the picked detachment of a thousand men, ordered him to direct
          attacks of great importance and danger, and offered him his eldest daughter,
          Merab, as a wife. Saul hoped to bring the man whom he hated to ruin by these
          apparent marks of favour. David, however, avoided the danger by refusing to
          marry Merab, and, on the other hand, he had the good fortune to defeat the
          Philistines. He was to have the king’s second daughter in marriage, if he
          brought proofs of having killed one hundred Philistines. He brought evidence of
          having slain double the number, and Saul was obliged to keep his promise, and
          give him his daughter Michal. She and Jonathan sided with David against their
          father, thus incensing Saul still more. He sought to take David’s life, at
          first secretly, and then openly by leading his forces against him. David was
          proclaimed an outlaw, and became utterly desperate. He was now joined by youths
          and men as forlorn as himself, and anxious for war. Chief amongst these was his
          kinsman, Joab, who, with his two brothers, formed the nucleus of the body of heroic
            warriors (Gibborim), by whose assistance David was to rise step
              by step to the throne. A prophet, named Gad, belonging to the school of Samuel,
              also joined him. The last representatives of the sacerdotal family of Eli, the
              high-priest, were driven by Saul into the arms of his supposed enemy. Saul,
              hearing that the priests of Nob, the relations and descendants of Eli, had been
              aiding David, caused them to be cruelly murdered, and the priestly city to be
              destroyed. One family alone, that of Abiatharescaped
                death, and fled to David, who received the fugitives with open arms. Hatred of
                his rival made Saul cruel and bloodthirsty. All attempts on the part of
                Jonathan, who desired to mediate between his father and his friend, proved
                fruitless, and only served to widen the breach. Saul being clearly in the
                wrong, a part of the nation sided with David; but unable to assist him openly,
                they gave him secret help, by which he was enabled to escape from repeated
                persecutions. It is to be deplored that David, in his wanderings and
                privations, was obliged to form friendly relations with the enemies of his
                country—with the king of Moab, with the Ammonite king, Nahash, and with the
                king of the Philistines, Achish. He thus incurred the suspicion of having
                become a traitor to his country, and apparently justified Saul’s enmity towards
                him. The terms of David’s alliance with Achish, by whom he had been at first
                refused protection, but with whom he had, on the second occasion, found refuge,
                seemed especially apt to implicate him. Achish granted him protection on the
                condition that he would break entirely with Saul and his country, so that, in
                case of war, he and his troops, amounting to six hundred men, might join the
                Philistines against his own tribe, and, in times of peace, make incursions on
                the remote portions of Judah, and deliver up a part of the booty to his liege
                lord. David, it is true, appears to have determined to evade these conditions,
                and eventually even to join his own people against his allies. But thus he was
                compelled to enter upon crooked ways, and to give up the honesty of purpose
                which had hitherto distinguished him. It is probable that the wild appearance
                of David’s troops did not make a very pleasant impression on the inhabitants of
                Philistia. The Philistine chiefs were displeased that their sovereign should
                ally himself with a leader who owed his glory to victories over their own
                people. King Achish, however, expected so much from this alliance that he paid
                no heed to the warning of his counsellors. But David himself felt the
                discomfort of living amongst the Philistine population. He therefore begged
                Achish to assign to him and his followers a dwelling-place in one of his
                citadels. This proposition being agreeable to the Philistine king, he gave
                David the town of Ziklag. No sooner had the news spread that a special city had
                been appointed for David’s occupation, than warlike men, both strangers and
                natives, joined him, many of whom distinguished themselves by their heroism
                later on. Achish believed that, in David, he had secured a faithful ally, who
                was employing his military knowledge and courage against members of his own
                tribe, and who, consequently, could never again make peace with his own people.
              
                
                  
                     
        Thus
          adroitly deluded by David, Achish thought himself secure in undertaking a
          decisive war against the Israelites. Saul was sunk in melancholy, and since his
          quarrel with his son-in-law had lost his former energy in warfare. The strong
          arm which had fought for him, and the quick brain which had planned for him,
          were now turned against him. The bravest youths and men in Israel had placed
          themselves under David’s command. Achish summoned all his troops, in order to
          inflict a decisive blow on Israel. Marching through the plain along the coast
          of the Mediterranean (which belonged to the Philistines since their victory
          over the Phoenicians), he led his army right into the valley of Jezreel. This
          territory, apart from political considerations, offered a better field than the
          mountain regions for employing the cavalry and chariots. In consequence of
          their treaty, Achish demanded that David should aid him in this great war
          against Saul, and unite his troops with the Philistine army. David’s heart must
          indeed have been heavy when he joined the army, but he had no choice; he had
          sold himself to the enemies of his nation. The Philistine nobles, however,
          delivered him from his equivocal position. They loudly and vehemently demanded
          that the king should send away David and his soldiers, whose fidelity they
          mistrusted. The Philistine king was forced, by their almost rebellious demand,
          to dismiss David. After giving him the assurance of his unshaken confidence in
          his fidelity, he sent him back to Ziklag. This was fortunate for David, as he
          was thus saved from the dilemma of either becoming a traitor to his own people,
          or breaking faith with his ally Achish.
                
          
          
                       
        The
          Philistines meanwhile went forth to the number of thousands, and encamped near
          the town of Shunem. Saul, who had received news of the preparations of the
          Philistines, and of their final expedition, called together the Israelitish
          troops, advanced in forced marches to meet the enemy, and encamped at first at
          the foot of Mount Gilboa. He then marched around the opposite heights, and,
          having proceeded northward, encamped at the northwest base of the mountain
          range near Endor.
          
          
          
                       
        Saul
          lost heart at the sight of the great number of Philistines, especially when he
          beheld their cavalry; the evil days which he had brought on himself had
          deprived him of his former courage. He felt himself deserted by God, since
          neither priest nor prophet gave an answer to his inquiry as to the result of
          the war. Having waited in vain for an inspiration to come to him in a dream, he
          finally, in despair, went to a ventriloquist in Endor, who had escaped
          persecution, and practised her witchcraft in secret. It was peculiar that Saul
          had to have recourse to the arts of jugglery, which formerly he had desired to
          banish from his dominions. Discouraged by the ominous predictions of the witch,
          Saul went into battle with a heavy heart, and as though his fears had infected
          his troops, the result proved disastrous. The Israelites, indeed, fought
          bravely, and the battle lasted the whole day, but they could not contend with
          the cavalry and war chariots on the plain. They fled to the mountains of
          Gilboa, but they were pursued, and routed by the Philistines. Saul’s three
          sons, the amiable Jonathan, Abin-adab and Malchishua, all fell, and the father
          found himself suddenly alone, attended only by his armour-bearer, whilst the
          Philistine bowmen pressed on him. He did not wish to flee, nor to be taken
          prisoner, and exposed to the scorn of the Philistines. He, therefore, entreated
          his servant to give him the death-blow, and when the latter refused to lay
          hands on the king, Saul had no alternative but to fall on his own sword, and
          die a death worthy of a king. The destruction was fearful. The flower of the
          Israelite troops lay strewn on Mount Gilboa and the plain of Jezreel.
          
          
          
                         
        After
          resting during the night from their hard day’s work, the Philistines revisited
          the battlefield, and stripped the slain of their clothing and ornaments. Here
          they found the corpses of Saul and his three sons. The king’s head and his
          weapons they sent as trophies to Philistia; the skull they preserved in the
          temple of Dagon, and the weapons, in a temple of Astarte to commemorate the
          great victory over Israel. They then forced their way into the towns in the
          plain of Jezreel, and into those in the northeastern territory near the Jordan
          and occupied them. The inhabitants, on hearing of the defeat at Gilboa, had
          fled to the opposite side of the Jordan. The Philistines, as an insult to the
          Israelites, hung the headless bodies of Saul and his son Jonathan on the walls
          of Bethshan. It appears that the Philistines, following up their victory,
          turned to the south of Mount Gilboa and Bethshan, and occupied every town of
          importance. Saul’s capital, Gibeah-Saul, was filled with terror at the approach
          of the Philistines. The inhabitants fled to the mountains, and while attempting
          to save Jonathan’s son, Mephibosheth, then five years old, his nurse dropped
          him, and he was lamed for life.
          
          
          
                           
        At
          his death, Saul left the country in a deplorable position, for things were even
          worse than they had been at his accession. The defeat was so thorough and
          unexpected that, at the moment, there was no thought of resistance, all courage
          having vanished. It was even considered an act of daring that some men of
          Jabesh-Gilead (from the opposite side of the Jordan), ventured, out of
          gratitude to Saul who had brought aid to their town, to rescue the king's body
          from its disgraceful exposure. They crossed the Jordan, at Bethshan, by night,
          took Saul’s and Jonathan’s bodies from the walls, buried them under a
          terebinth, and mourned for them during seven days. The tribes on this side of
          the Jordan were not equally courageous, or perhaps felt no gratitude to Saul, who
          had brought misery on the land by his persecution of David. Such was the end of
          a king whose election the nation had hailed with so much hope and joy.
          
           
          
        DAVID AND ISHBOSHETH. 
          
          1055—1035
            B.C.
            
            
          
        
          
          DAVID, too, in whom the people had once set high
          hopes, seemed to be forgotten by them. What had he done while his fatherland
          was bleeding? Whether or not his expedition with the Philistines was known, it
          must have appeared strange to all that, in this sad crisis, he was keeping
          himself aloof from every danger, only caring for his own safety, and that,
          instead of hastening to the aid of his oppressed people, he was holding to his
          treaty with the Philistines. It is true, he was himself at that time in
          distress, but the events which concerned him became known only later on.
          Meanwhile it must have been mortifying to those who cared for the weal of the
          kingdom that David was allied with the enemy, and that, during the absence of
          king Achish, in the war against Israel, David seemed in a measure to guard the
          enemy's frontiers. When David was sent back from his intended expedition with
          the Philistines on account of the suspicions of the nobles, he found that his
          town of Ziklag had been burnt down, and the women and children and all those
          who had joined him had disappeared. The Amalekites, who had suffered from
          David’s incursions, had made use of his absence to undertake a raid against
          him. The grief of the troops was so great when they found that their belongings
          had disappeared and their town had been destroyed that they turned on David in
          their anger, and threatened him with death. However, they were encouraged by
          the oracular words of Abiathar, the priest, and permitted themselves to be
          appeased. Hurriedly David and his men then followed in pursuit. They discovered
          the camp of the Amalekites by the aid of an Egyptian slave whom they had found
          ill and deserted by the wayside. They pursued the Amalekites, and David's angry
          soldiers routed them so completely that most of them were left dead on the
          field of battle, and only a few could escape on camels. David and his troops
          returned to Ziklag, buoyed up by victory. They commenced to rebuild their town,
          and to settle down. Parts of the booty taken from the Amalekites David sent as
          gifts to the elders of the people and to his friends in many towns from
          Beersheba to Hebron, so as to spread the news of his victory, and, at the same
          time, gain partisans for himself. Hardly had he regained a firm footing in
          Ziklag, when he heard the evil tidings of the defeat and death of Saul.
          
          
            
               
        The
          chief men of the tribe of Judah, at the instigation of those friends whose
          interest he had won by his attention, chose David as king. He then entered into
          communication with the tribes on the other side of the Jordan, in order to win
          also their affection. To the tribes on this side of the river he could not
          appeal, as they were still under the yoke of the Philistines. To the
          inhabitants of Jabesh-Gilead, he expressed his contentment and his thanks for
          having shown their fidelity towards Saul even after his death, and for having
          rescued the corpse of the king from ill usage. He also informed them of the
          fact that the tribe of Judah had elected him as Saul’s successor.
          
          
          
               
        His
          unhappy fate, however, still kept him in alliance with the Philistines, and
          his prudence was struggling with his patriotism. The latter incited him to risk
          everything, in order to release himself from the fetters which bound him,
          whilst the former, on the other hand, warned him not to arouse the anger of his
          powerful neighbour. Achish gave David full permission to consider himself king
          of Judah, and to make incursions on the border lands of the desert, on
          condition that he received his share of the booty. But beyond this David was
          not permitted to advance a step. The deliverance of the land from the
          Philistines, which David, whose hands were bound, was unable to carry out, was
          effected by Abner, Saul’s general. He had succeeded in escaping in the great
          defeat at Gilboa, and he did not lose courage, but saved what he could from the
          ruin which befell the house of Saul. Attended by some fugitives, he took refuge
          on the other side of the Jordan (beyond the reach of the Philistines), where
          many hearts were still faithful to Saul and his house. Abner conducted the
          surviving son of Saul, Ishbosheth, and the remaining members of the helpless
          royal family to Mahanaim, and induced the tribes residing on that side of the
          river to acknowledge Ishbosheth as Saul’s successor. Having collected a
          powerful force from among the tribes and the Benjamites who joined him, he
          commenced his contest with the Philistines. Abner was successful in ousting the
          Philistines from the neighbouring border towns, but it was only after a struggle
          of four or five years that he was enabled to free the whole country(1055-1051),
          so arduous was the contest. The tribe of Benjamin was the most difficult to
          reconquer, as the Philistines could most easily march their troops into its
          territory. Every tribe which Abner delivered was eager to pay homage to the son
          of Saul. Abner achieved great results: he not only regained independence, but
          even induced tribes, which had shown themselves unruly under Saul’s government,
          to join the commonwealth. He was the actual founder of the kingdom of the Ten
          Tribes or Israel, and he firmly welded the links which bound them to one
          another. But, notwithstanding his victory and his exertions, the nation was
          suddenly divided into two kingdoms—that of Israel and that of Judah—and two
          kings ruled them. The tribe of Judah, which the energy of Samuel and of Saul
          had drawn from its seclusion, and reunited with the other tribes, was thus
          again separated from the whole.
                
          
          
                 
        Abner’s
          victories aroused no feelings of joy because they led to disunion. The
          historian’s pen hurries over his deeds, and touches but lightly on the hero’s
          achievements. The state of affairs made an amalgamation of the houses of Judah
          and Israel impossible. Not only were the two kings, David and Ishbosheth,
          averse to the reunion of the several tribes (as in this case one of the two
          would have to resign his kingly dignity), but their adherents, and especially
          their respective generals, Joab and Abner, displayed a great degree of mutual
          jealousy. The scales were turned by the fact that the house of Judah was led by
          a brave and martial king, who had been consecrated by Samuel, and whose person
          was therefore considered holy, whilst Ishbosheth, a king only in name, had not
          been confirmed in his dignity by the voice of God, and besides, it seems, was
          by no means of a warlike disposition. The whole power rested in the hands of
          his general Abner, while Ishbosheth remained in some remote corner of his
          possessions, whereas David had his dwelling-place in the midst of his tribe,
          and thus could direct everything from his residence in Hebron.
          
          
          
                   
        After
          Abner had won or reconquered all the tribes, with the exception of Judah, a
          civil war broke out between the houses of Israel and Judah, or, more correctly
          speaking, between the houses of Saul and David. This war lasted two years (1051-1049), and
            raged very fiercely. At length Abner called upon Joab to put an end to the
            slaughter of the masses. He cried, “Must the sword slay for ever; do you not
            know that only misfortune can arise from this warfare? Why do you not command
            your people to hold off from their brethren?”. At length Joab also found it
            advisable to put aside his weapons, and to proclaim an armistice. He and his
            people bore the corpse of his brother Asahel, whom Abner had slain against his
            will, to Bethlehem, in order that it might be interred in the ancestral tomb,
            and thence they repaired to Hebron. Abner and his followers crossed the Jordan,
            and went to Mahanaim. But a tragical destiny threatened the house of Saul.
            Abner had cast covetous glances at Rizpah, the beautiful slave of Saul, who
            dwelt in Mahanaim with her two sons. Although Ishbosheth allowed his general
            many liberties, he could not permit him to maintain intimate relations with his
            father’s widow, which implied the intention of laying claim to the throne.
            Abner, feeling himself slighted by the rebuke he received, reproached this mock
            king with ingratitude, and turning away from him, entered into secret
            negotiations with David, offering to secure to him the homage of all the
            tribes. In return for this service, he probably stipulated that he should
            retain his office of commander-in-chief of the Israelitish tribes. David gladly
            entertained his proposition, but demanded, as a preliminary concession, that
            his favourite wife Michal, who had been torn from him by Saul, and married to a
            Benjamite, should be restored to him. Ishbosheth himself no doubt saw the
            justice of this demand, and did not perceive in it any evil intention towards
            himself. Thereupon Abner, leaving the king under the pretext of bringing about
            Michal's separation from her husband, entered the Benjamite territory,
            compelled Phaltiel, Michal's husband, to give up his wife, whom he followed,
            with many tears, till Abner’s angry threats compelled him to turn back in
            sorrow, and David recovered the beloved wife of his youth. Abner then wandered
            about amongst the tribes trying to obtain secret adherents for David. Many
            Israelites no doubt privately wished that the luckless civil war would end with
            submission to the king of Judah; even some of the Benjamites were not averse to
            a union. Attended by twenty trusty followers whom he had secured for David,
            Abner secretly entered Hebron; David had succeeded in sending away Joab and his
            brothers (the distrustful and jealous sons of Zeruiah) on a predatory
            expedition. During their absence, David personally arranged with Abner and his
            twenty followers the manner in which the elders of the tribes should be won
            over to his side, and how the dethronement of Ishbosheth should then be
            effected. Abner had already left Hebron in order to call upon the elders of the
            tribes to follow his example, and do homage to the king of Judah. When Joab
            returned from his expedition, he heard the astonishing intelligence that
            Abner, the enemy of David’s house, had been received, and permitted to depart
            in full favour, and that the king had made a secret treaty behind his back. As
            it seemed to him inevitable that he must be the victim of such a compact, he
            quickly decided on his course, and sent messengers after Abner, who induced him
            to return. Joab and Abishai lay in wait for him at the gates of Hebron, and
            Abner, unaware and unwarned, was felled to the earth by their swords. David felt the death of Abner acutely. The man who alone was able and willing to
            obtain for him the adherence of all the tribes by peaceful measures was thus
            foully murdered, on the very eve of the realisation of his plan. David was
            placed in an awkward position. In order to destroy any suspicion which might
            arise against him, David gave solemn expression to his sincere grief at Abner’s
            loss. He commanded a grand, imposing funeral in Hebron for Israel’s fallen
            hero, ordered all his followers to attend the funeral procession, and
            accompanied it himself. He breathed forth his tearful grief in an elegiac poem,
            the beginning of which has been preserved, and which made a powerful impression
            on all hearers. All burst into tears, and were convinced of the sincerity of
            his sorrow by the manner in which he recited his threnode. On the other hand,
            David feared to take the sons of Zeruiah to account, or even to reproach them
            for their conduct; he could not spare their assistance. In the circle of his
            intimates only, uttering bitter complaints of them, he said, “Know that a great
            prince in Israel has fallen today”.
            
            
              
                   
        The
          news of Abner’s murder made a deep impression on Ishbosheth. He had no
          knowledge of his fallen general's treacherous league with David, and he
          therefore deeply mourned the death of a hero whom he supposed to be faithful,
          and whose loss seemed to be irreparable, for he considered Abner as the chief
          support of his throne.
                
          
          
                 
        After
          Ishbosheth’s death the kingdom of the ten tribes naturally fell to David. Among
          them, too, he had adherents of long standing, who remembered his warlike deeds
          against the Philistines in Saul’s time, and who honoured him as the chosen one
          of God through his prophet Samuel. Others had been won over to his side by
          Abner. Even those who took offence at David’s league with the enemies of
          Israel, could not hide from themselves the consideration that no choice was
          left them but to do him homage. The Benjamites also acknowledged him, but with
          a secret grudge, which they could hardly conceal. David’s dearest wish was now
          realised; from having been the ruler of a little, insignificant tribe he had
          become, after many obstacles and troubles, the king of all Israel. The breach
          between the houses of Judah and Israel was healed apparently, and everything
          seemed favourable to him. The priesthood and the prophets did not take a
          hostile attitude towards him, as they had done towards Saul, but joined with
          heart and soul in his cause. A descendant of the house of Eli, named Abiathar,
          who had shared David’s troubles, belonged to his court; and the prophets
          welcomed in him the man who had been anointed by Samuel, and had belonged to
          that great man’s circle of disciples. The prophet Gad was also a member of the
          court; and another prophet of the time, named Nathan, was to a certain extent
          the keeper of David’s conscience. Thus encouraged in all his undertakings by
          his spiritual advisers, everything tended to level the way for him, as far as
          the internal government was concerned. But his foreign relations occasioned him
          great difficulties, which had to be overcome before he could rule as an
          independent king.
          
          
          
                   
        In
          the first place, David was forced to break with the Philistines, if he wished
          to be independent, and to win back the love of his people. He had to prepare
          himself for fierce warfare with his former auxiliaries. But he did not
          immediately commence hostilities with them; they were too powerful for him. He
          wished first to free himself from other bonds. In the midst of the Benjamite
          territory was an enclosure, which had remained in the possession of the
          Jebusites, because the Israelites, on their entry into the land, had not
          conquered it. The high hill of ZION was
            rendered inaccessible on three sides by narrow valleys and artificial
            fortifications. The most impregnable point was the south side, where the rocky
            wall of the hill rose almost in a vertical line from an abyss below. From this
            mountain fortress, the Jebusites ruled the entire surrounding territory, and
            felt themselves secure from all intruders. They appear to have lived in a state
            of peace with the surrounding Benjamites and Judaeans, as even Saul did not
            disturb them in the possession of their territory. David, however, considered
            it conducive to his interest to obtain possession of this citadel of Zion
            before commencing hostilities with the Philistines. He therefore resolved to
            storm the citadel, and subdue its defenders. As soon as the Jebusites found all
            opposition useless they sued for peace, which was granted them by David. They
            were allowed to remain in their city, but not in the fortress; he permitted
            them to settle in the east of the town, on Mount Moriah. This victory, which
            had appeared so difficult, and had, in fact, been easily obtained, had been
            preceded by the boast of the Jebusites about the blind and the lame, which gave
            rise to a proverb.
            
            
              
               
        After
          its conquest, David removed his capital from Hebron to Mount Zion, and it was
          henceforth known as the town of David. The city itself lost its old name of
          Jebus, and received the new name Jerusalem, the
            meaning of which is not known. Hither David removed with his warriors and their
            families, and his courtiers. The spot where the bravest soldiers had their
            dwellings was called after them the house of the brave. Such
              was the beginning of the place which since then, and for centuries, was to be
              known as the “Holy City”. The choice of this spot as a capital was a happy
              stroke, as circumstances soon proved. It is true, Shechem would have made a
              better metropolis, on account of its position in the midst of the tribes, and
              the fruitful territory around it. But David found it impossible to move his
              dwelling to the town of the Ephraimites. The inhabitants were not especially
              well disposed towards him, and rather unwilling that the half-savage king, who
              sprang from Judah, should prescribe laws to them. Besides, he needed the
              support of his own tribe, and this he could have in Jerusalem, which was
              situated on the boundaries of Benjamin and Judah, and which would serve as a
              protection in the event of unruliness on the part of the other tribes. The
              territory on which the new capital was erected was not sterile, though it could
              bear no comparison with the part of the country in which Shechem lay. In the
              valleys flow everlasting springs, the springs of Siloah and En-Rogel in the
              south, the Gihon in the west; so that in the dry season the town and fields can
              always be supplied with water. On three sides Jerusalem is surrounded by a
              range of hills which protect and embellish it. On the east is a high watershed (2724 feet),
                Mount Olivet, so named from the olive trees which cover it. In the south the
                hills are not so lofty, and the valley dividing them from the city is narrower.
                The valley is that of Henna (Gehenna), which was thus named after an individual
                or a family, and which was destined to acquire a sad renown, and to supply
                another appellation for hell (Gehenna). On
                  the west the summits are also low, and can hardly be called hills. On the
                  north, the hills gently slope down to the plain. By these hills and valleys,
                  which form natural walls and ditches, Jerusalem is sheltered on three sides.
                  Within Jerusalem, on the high plateau and between the three valleys on the
                  east, south, and west, there are three ranges of hills rising above the plain.
                  On the west is Zion, the loftiest summit. On the north is a hill of no great
                  height; and opposite the third is Mount Moriah, which has an offshoot towards
                  the south, called “Ophel”. Moriah, though much less lofty than Zion, was
                  destined to eclipse it and the greatest heights on earth in importance.
                  
                  
                    
                               
        The
          Philistines could not ignore the fact that the choice of David as king of the
          entire Israelite nation had not only greatly loosened the bond which united him
          to them, but that it must in the future force him to take up a hostile attitude
          towards themselves. They did not, however, wish to break with him. But when the
          conquest of Jebus (Jerusalem) took place, they considered the fact of his
          removing his dwelling thither as a premonitory sign. They hastened to join with
          him in battle, before he had time to arm the available troops of the various
          tribes. A Philistine band pressed forward across the plain into the mountains,
          and approached Jerusalem. Whether David was surprised by their attack, or
          whether he wished to avoid an action near his capital, is unknown, but he left
          it with his troops, and moved southwards to Adullam. Encouraged by this
          retreat, the Philistines pressed on to Bethlehem, David’s birthplace, where
          they encamped, and whence they sent out predatory expeditions to ravage the
          land of Judah. David delayed attacking the Philistines; his army was probably
          too weak, and he expected reinforcements from the tribes. In order to stimulate
          his warriors to trials of strength during the pause before the decisive
          contest, David expressed a wish to drink water from a well in Bethlehem, which
          was in the possession of the Philistines. Three of the chief warriors,
          Jesheboam, Eleazar, and Shammah, immediately set out against the Philistines,
          daringly drew water from the well, and brought it to David at Adullam. David,
          however, would not drink the water for which his warriors had risked their
          lives.   He had only put them to the test. At length the
          Israelite troops went forth to meet the Philistines, and utterly routed them at
          Mount Baal-Perazim. This victory was so decisive that it was compared with
          Joshua’s at Gibeon. In their hurried flight, the Philistines left behind them
          their idols, which were burnt by the Israelites. The enemy did not, however,
          relinquish their intention of subduing David and his people. They made repeated
          attacks, once in the valley of Rephaim, another time near
          Ephesdammim  in Terebinthea; David’s troops and warriors performed
          miracles of bravery, they defeated their enemies, and pursued them as far as
          Gaza. David did not content himself with mere defence, but he determined on
          attacking the Philistines. If he wished to protect his people, it was
          necessary either constantly to harass, or to subdue the small but powerful
          nation which depended on incursions and warfare for its maintenance. He
          therefore proceeded with his soldiers as far as Gath, the former capital of the
          Philistines, which was situated nearest to the land of Judaea. The Philistines
          made a very obstinate resistance, and violent conflicts arose, in which David’s
          heroes had ample opportunity for distinguishing themselves. It appears that the
          Philistines suggested, according to their custom, that there should be combats
          with the remnant of their Rephaitic giants. Times had changed, however, and
          whilst in David’s youth the Israelitish troops had not had among them a single
          soldier who would accept Goliath's challenge, there were now more than thirty
          who burned with eagerness to take part in the duels. On this occasion the
          warriors entreated the king not to expose himself in battle, and, in fact, not
          to go to war himself, in order that “the light of Israel” might not be
          extinguished.
          
          
          
                                 
        At
          length the Israelites succeeded in utterly routing the Philistines, so that
          they were obliged to surrender their capital Gath, and its villages and the
          surrounding territory. The town in which the son of Jesse had first appeared,
          entreating help in the guise of an imbecile, thus fell before him. One of the
          thirty warriors, Sibbechai of Hushah, killed the giant Sippai of Gath; another
          man from Bethlehem named Elhanan, killed the brother of Goliath, named Lahmi,
          who had sallied forth to the contest like Goliath, laden with armour. David’s
          nephew Jonathan killed a giant who had an additional finger on each hand, and
          an additional toe on each foot. David himself was once, when exhausted from the
          long struggle, in imminent danger of being overcome by the giant Ishbi of Gath;
          Abishai, however, Joab’s brother, hurried to his aid, defeated the giant, and
          killed three hundred Philistines with his spear. The overthrow of the
          Philistines was an event of the greatest importance; it ensured lasting peace
          and freedom of action to the people, for none of" the other enemies of
          Israel harassed it so persistently. David did not push his victory further; he
          left the important cities of Gaza, Askelon, Ashdod and Ekron undisturbed, and
          even the town of Gath he appears later on to have restored to its king. No
          doubt he had reasons for not using extreme measures with the Philistines. It
          appeared to him better to rule them as a tributary power than to drive them to
          a war of desperation.
          
          
          
                                 
        By
          his victory over the Philistines, David attained great importance and respect
          in the eyes of the neighbouring peoples. Hiram, the king who had transferred
          the Phoenician power from Zidon to Tyre, despatched ambassadors to David,
          offering to make an alliance with him. He also offered to send supplies of
          cedar wood and building materials for adorning the new capital of Jerusalem in
          a fitting manner. He rejoiced at the subjection of the Philistines, probably
          because they would no longer be able to cast covetous glances at the Phoenician
          coast-lands. It was a matter of great interest to the king of Tyre to secure an
          alliance with David, in order that the Phoenician caravans might have free
          passage, and find protection for their goods when they passed backwards and
          forwards between Phoenicia and Egypt. David willingly accepted his advances,
          and thus a sort of friendship arose between him and Hiram. He accepted Hiram’s
          offer in order to fortify the capital which had been founded by him, and to
          obtain materials for adorning it with architectural works, so that Jerusalem
          might vie in outward appearance with the other capitals of those times. In the
          first place Jerusalem was fortified, especially on the north, where it was most
          liable to be attacked. The hill of Zion, or City of David, was, in fact, not
          sufficiently extensive to contain all the inhabitants who had already settled
          there, and it had become necessary to take measures to provide for the
          increasing population. For this reason, the hill which lay to the north of the
          town was included in its boundaries. Between Zion and this hillock lay a narrow
          valley. The northern elevation of the town was called Millo (border);
            it was considered the newer quarter of the town, in comparison with the more ancient
            city of David. Mount Moriah and its offshoot Ophel remained outside the circuit
            of the city, and in those days was not considered as belonging to Jerusalem,
            but was inhabited by the surviving remnant of the Jebusites. David also built a
            palace of cedar, the wood for which was procured from Lebanon. To Joab and the
            other important personages of David’s court were assigned roomy and well-built
            houses, which were not constructed of cedar wood, but of cypress.
            
            
              
                 
        David
          further sought to make Jerusalem the centre of religious life, in order that
          the eyes of the whole nation might be turned towards it. He therefore took
          measures to remove the ark of the sanctuary from the house of Abinadab at
          Kirjath-Jearim, where it had remained since its recovery from the hands of the
          Philistines. A splendid tent was built for its reception in the city of David.
          David had vowed not to remain in his house, nor to rest on his bed, nor to
          close his eyes in sleep until he had found a resting-place for the ark of the
          covenant. Accompanied by a great concourse, the king repaired to Kirjath-Jearim
          (which lay at about an hour’s journey to the north-west of Jerusalem), and many
          Levites followed in the king's train. The ark of the sanctuary was placed on a
          new carriage drawn by bullocks, which were led by two sons of Abinadab. Choirs
          of Levites sang hymns, and accompanied themselves on stringed instruments, and
          David also assisted them with all his might. An accident, however, occurred on
          the road. Uzzah, who walked next to the chariot, suddenly fell down dead. David
          was so shocked at this catastrophe that he hesitated to carry the ark of the
          covenant into Jerusalem. He feared that it might bring down misfortune on the
          people, as it had done in the case of the Philistines. It was therefore placed
          in a house for three months, and, seeing that no evil came of it, David
          determined on making a second attempt at bringing it to Mount Zion. On this
          occasion, however, it was not placed on a chariot, but was carried by Levites.
          Followed by a mass of people, and amidst shouts of joy, blasts of trumpets, and
          dancing, the ark was conveyed to the tent appointed for it. The king himself,
          oblivious of his dignity, sang and danced in exultation before the ark. His
          conduct called forth a rebuke from his wife Michal, who scoffingly charged him
          with behaving like a public clown.
          
          
          
               
        As it
          had done in the case of Shiloh, the arrival of the Ark raised Jerusalem to the
          dignity of a holy city. In such a place of public worship, it was necessary to
          maintain a priest, or rather a priesthood. Abiathar, David’s faithful follower
          in all his wanderings, was, as a matter of course, raised to the office of High
          Priest to the sanctuary in Zion. There was, however, another high priest in
          Gibeon, whom Saul had placed there after the destruction of Eli’s family in
          Nob. David could not entirely displace him, for such a course would have led to
          dissensions. He therefore confirmed his predecessor’s appointment, and thus
          retained two high priests in office at the same time—Abiathar in Jerusalem, and
          Zadok in Gibeon. A former pupil of the Levitical choirs, himself a poet and a
          musician, David naturally followed Samuel’s example and introduced choral
          singing into the solemn religious services. He also composed hymns of praise at
          times, when a victory over the enemy, or some other success filled his heart
          with thankfulness, and animated him with poetical fervour. It may be said that
          his songs have become the prototypes of this lofty and inspiring style of
          verse. Besides the royal psalmist there were other poets and musicians, such as
          Asaph, Heman, a grandson of Samuel, and Jeduthun. Their descendants were the
          Asaphites and Korachites (Bene Korach), who are named with David as the most
          famous composers of psalms. David arranged that Asaph and his choir should lead
          the choral service in the sanctuary at Jerusalem, whilst his fellow-musicians,
          Heman and Jeduthun, performed the same functions at the altar in Gibeon.
          Samuel’s creation of a spiritual divine service was thus firmly established by
          David; and though he was an upholder of sacrificial rites, he valued the
          elevating and refining influence of psalmody too highly not to make it an
          integral element of the public cult. At a time when poetry as an art had hardly
          awakened amongst the other nations, it already occupied a prominent place in
          the divine service of Israel.
                
          
          
                 
        As
          David was the actual founder of a sanctifying divine worship, he was also the creator
          of a system of government which was based on justice. He presided at the
          tribunal, listened untiringly to the disputes of individuals or of tribes, and
          administered justice with strict impartiality. His throne was not only the high
          seat of government and power, it was also that of order and justice. Succeeding
          generations pronounced David the ideal king. His throne was looked upon as the
          prop of justice, and his sceptre as the standard of civic peace. Jerusalem was
          by him made an ideal city, where a pure worship of God had been established,
          and justice, in its most exalted form, had found its earthly resting-place. A
          later psalmist says—
          
          
          
                   
        “Jerusalem,
          that art builded as a city that is compact together,
          
          
          
                     
        Whither
          the tribes go up, even the tribes of the Lord;
          
          
          
                       
        For a
          testimony unto Israel,
          
          
          
                         
        To
          give thanks unto the name of the Lord.
          
          
          
                           
        For
          there are set thrones for judgment,
          
          
          
                           
        The
          thrones of the house of David”.
          
          
          
                           
                 PSALM CXXII. 3-5.
          
          
          
                           
        Jerusalem
            was considered “a faithful citadel—full of righteousness— where justice had its
            dwelling-place”. These circumstances, the deliverance from the yoke of the
            Philistines, the universal safety, and the establishment of justice under
            David’s rule, rendered him again the favourite of the people, as he had been in
            his youth. A feeling of loyalty to him prevailed, which was of spontaneous
            growth, and in which force had no share.
                    
            
              
             
        David
          partly altered the internal arrangements of the country. The constitution of
          the tribes remained intact. The elders represented the families, and the head
          of the oldest family was also the prince of his tribe (Naszi-Beth-Ab). The
          princes were the representatives of the tribes with the
          king.   But it was necessary to limit the freedom, or rather the
          arbitrariness of the tribes, in regard to military arrangements. Each tribe, in
          case of war, was bound to contribute a number of capable soldiers (over twenty
          years of age) as its contingent to the national army (Zaba). A
            special officer was appointed over this contingent, who was called the
            enumerator (Sopher), or the keeper of the rolls. He wrote down
              on a list the names of the men fit for active service, looked to their
              enrolment, and compelled the attendance of all defaulters. This duty David
              delegated to a man named Shavsha, from whom it passed on to his heirs. As soon
              as the army was assembled, it was commanded by the field officer (Sar-ha-Zaba), who
                at this conjuncture was Joab. David also supported a troop of mercenaries whom
                he recruited from the heathen soldiery, the Cherethites, who came from a
                territory belonging to the Philistine dominions, and the Pelethites, whose
                origin is unknown. Benaiah, son of Jehoiada, one of the bravest of David’s
                soldiers, was their commander. David also appointed a special officer on whom
                devolved the duty of reporting to the king all important, or apparently
                important events. He was called  the recorder (Maskkir). As
                  favouritism is inseparable from kingly will, David also had a favourite (named
                  Hushai the Arkhi) on whom he could rely under all circumstances, especially in
                  cases requiring discretion. He was also fortunate in having an adviser at hand,
                  who could give suitable counsel in various emergencies; his name was
                  Ahithophel, and his birthplace was the Judaean town of Gilo. At that time his
                  advice was currently said to be as infallible as the oracles uttered by the
                  lips of the high priest. This wise and overwise councillor of David was
                  destined to exercise a great influence over his royal master. At one time
                  David’s judicial conscience was put to a severe test. A famine of long duration
                  overspread the land on account of a two years’ drought. The distress continued
                  to grow when, at the commencement of the third year, no rain had fallen, and
                  the people turned to the king for help. This misfortune, in which the entire
                  country shared, was interpreted as being God-sent retribution for some secret
                  and unavenged sin. David therefore inquired of the priest Abiathar what sin
                  required expiation, and the answer came, “on account of Saul and his ruthless
                  persecution of the Gibeonites”. David then sent to the remnant of the
                  Gibeonites, and inquired of them what atonement they desired. Not satisfied
                  with an expiatory sum of money, they demanded that seven descendants of Saul
                  should be hanged in Gibeah-Saul. The demand of the Gibeonites seemed just, for
                  according to the views of the time, only blood could atone for the shedding of blood
                  and a breach of faith. With a heavy heart David had to comply with the demand
                  of the Gibeonites, and satisfy the desire of the nation. The two sons of Saul’s
                  concubine Rizpah, and his grandson, the son of his daughter Merab, were sought
                  out, handed over to the Gibeonites, and killed by them in cold blood, in
                  Gibeah-Saul, the town in which their father had won a crown.
                
                  
                    
                     
        David
          spared only Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan, for he remembered the oath made
          to his friend, that he would always protect his descendants. The corpses of the
          seven victims were to remain on the gallows until rain should fall from the
          heavens, but it was long ere the rainfall came. It was in those dire days that
          the beautiful Rizpah, for whose sake Abner had quarrelled with Ishbosheth,
          showed of what a mother’s love is capable. In order to prevent her sons’
          corpses from being devoured by eagles and jackals, she made her couch on the
          rocks on which the bodies were exposed, and guarded them with a watchful eye
          through the heat of day. Nor did she relax her vigilance in the night, but
          continued her work of scaring away the beasts of prey from the dead. When at
          length in the autumn the rain fell, the seven bodies were taken down, and at
          David’s command the last honours were bestowed on them. He also seized this
          opportunity to remove the remains of Saul and Jonathan from Jabesh-Gilead, and
          to bury them, together with the remains of their kindred, in the family tomb of
          the house of Kish at Zelah. It appears that, on this occasion, David caused his
          deeply touching lament for the death of Saul and of Jonathan to be reproduced,
          in order to express publicly how deeply the destruction of the royal house of
          Benjamin had affected him. He directed that the elegy should be committed to
          memory by the youths of the country. Jonathan’s surviving son, Mephibosheth
          (who had been living in the house of a much-respected man on the other side of
          the Jordan) was brought to Jerusalem, and David received him in his own house,
          placed him at his own table, and treated him as one of his own sons. David also
          restored to him Saul’s lands in the tribe of Benjamin, and entrusted the management
          of them to one of Saul's slaves, named Ziba. Notwithstanding this, the
          Benjamites accused David of destroying the house of Saul, and of having preserved
          Mephibosheth, because he was lame and unfit to rule. When David’s fortune was
          on the wane, the embittered Benjamites cast stones at him.
          
          
          
           
        DAVID. 
          
           1035—1015. B.C.
          
            
              
                  
                  
                   
                  
                  
        WHEN David
          had completed two decades of his reign, he became involved in several wars, which
          withdrew him from the peaceful pursuits of regulating the internal affairs of
          the country, and of attending to the administration of justice. These wars with
          distant nations, forced on him against his will, gave him an immense accession
          of power, and raised the prestige of the people in a surprising degree. David
          first began a fierce warfare with the Moabites, who dwelt on the opposite side
          of the Dead Sea. With them he had been on friendly terms during his wanderings,
          and amongst them he had met with a hospitable reception. It is probable that
          the Moabites had ousted from their possession the neighbouring Reubenites, and
          that David hurried to their rescue. It must in any case have been a war of
          retribution, for, after his victory, David treated the prisoners with a
          severity which he did not display towards any of the other nations whom he
          conquered. The Moabite captives were fettered, and cast side by side on the
          ground, then measured with a rope, and two divisions were killed, whilst one
            division was spared. The whole land of Moab was subdued, and a yearly tribute
            was to be sent to Jerusalem.
              
                   
        Some
          time afterwards, when Nahash, king of the Ammonites, died, David, who had been
          on friendly terms with him, sent an embassy to his son Hanun, with messages of
          condolence. This courtesy only roused suspicion in Rabbath-Ammon, the capital
          of the Ammonites. The new king’s counsellors impressed him with the idea that
          David had sent his ambassadors as spies to Rabbah, in order to discover their
          weakness, to conquer them, and to deliver them over to the same fate that had
          befallen the Moabites. Hanun was so carried away by his suspicions that he
          offered an insult to the king of Israel which could not be passed over
          unnoticed. He obliged the ambassadors, whose persons, according to the laws of
          nations, were inviolable, to have their beards shaved off on one side, and
          their garments cut short, and thus disgraced he drove them out of the country.
          The ambassadors were ashamed to appear at Jerusalem in this guise, but they
          informed David of the occurrence. He immediately prepared himself for battle,
          and the militia was called out; the old warriors girded their loins, and the
          Cherethite and Pelethite mercenaries sallied forth with their heroic leader
          Benaiah at their head. Hanun, who feared the valor of the Israelites, looked
          around for help, and engaged mercenary troops from among the Aramaeans, who
          lived in the regions between the mountains of Hermon and the banks of the
          Euphrates. Hadadezer, king of Zobah on the Euphrates, contributed the greatest
          number—20,000 men. David did not personally conduct
            this war, but left the supreme command with the careful and reliable Joab.
            Having led the Israelite army across the Jordan, Joab divided it into two
            bodies. With the one he attacked the Aramaeans, the other he left under the
            command of his brother Abishai. He aroused the enthusiasm of his army by inspiring
              words: “Let us fight bravely for our people and the city of our God, and may
              the Lord God do what seemeth good unto Him”. Joab then dashed at the Aramaeans,
              and put them to flight. On this, the Ammonites were seized with such fear that
              they withdrew from the field, and took shelter behind the walls of their
              capital. It was a most successful achievement. Joab hurried to Jerusalem to
              report to the king, and to lay before him a plan by which the Aramaeans might
              be totally annihilated, and any future interference on their part prevented.
              The victorious army, having been recalled from the Aramonitish territories, was
              reinforced, and with the king himself at its head pursued the Aramaean enemy on
              the other side of the Jordan. King Hadadezer, on his part, also sent fresh
              troops to the aid of his defeated forces, but in a battle at Helam, the
              Aramaean army was again defeated, and its general, Shobach, fell in the
              encounter. The vassals of the mighty Hadadezer then hastened to make peace with
              David.
              
              
                
                   
        Toi
          (or Tou) the king of Hamath, who had been at war with Hadadezer, now sent his
          son Joram to David with presents, congratulating him on the victory over their
          common foe. David followed up his successes until he reached the capital of
          king Hadadezer, situated on the banks of the Euphrates. The Aramaeans were then
          defeated a third time; their chariots and soldiers could not withstand the
          attack of the Israelite army. The extensive district of Zobah, to which various
          princes had been tributary, was divided into several parts.
          
          
          
                   
        The
          king of Damascus, an ally of the king of Zobah, was also defeated by David, and
          the ancient town of Damascus henceforth belonged to the king of Israel. David
          placed land-overseers in all the Aramaean territories from Hermon to the
          Euphrates, in order to enforce the payment of tribute. David and his army
          themselves must have been astonished at the wonderful result which they had
          achieved. It rendered the king and his army objects of fear far and wide.
          Meanwhile the king of the Ammonites had escaped punishment for his insults to
          the ambassadors of Israel. In consequence of the campaign against the
          Aramaeans, which lasted nearly a year, the Israelitish army had been unable to
          resume the war against Hanun. It was only after the great events narrated above
          that David was again enabled to send his forces, under Joab, against Ammon. Yet
          another war arose out of the hostilities against this nation. The Idumaeans, on
          the south of the Dead Sea, had also assisted the Ammonites by sending troops to
          their aid, and these had to be humiliated now. David deputed his second
          general, Abishai, Joab’s brother, to direct the campaign against the Idumaeans.
          Joab was in the meantime engaged in a long contest with the Ammonites, who had
          secured themselves behind the strong walls of their fortified capital, and were
          continually making raids on their foes. The Israelitish army had neither
          battering rams nor other instruments of siege. Their only alternative was to
          storm the heights of the city, and in their attempts to carry out this plan
          they were often repelled by the bowmen on the walls. At length Joab succeeded,
          after repeated attacks, in gaining possession of one part of the city—the
          Water-Town; he reported this victory to David at once, and urged him to repair
          to the camp in order to lead in person the attack on the other quarters, so
          that the honour of the conquest might be entirely his own. When David arrived
          at Rabbah with fresh troops, he succeeded in subduing the whole town, and in
          obtaining rich booty. David himself put on his head the golden diadem, richly
          adorned with precious stones, which had heretofore crowned the Ammonitish idol
          Malchom (Milchom). It appears that David did not destroy the city of Rabbah, as
          he had intended. He merely condemned the male inhabitants, or perhaps only the
          prisoners, to do hard work, such as polishing stones, threshing with iron
          rollers, hewing wood with axes, and making bricks. He treated the other
          prisoners from the various towns in a similar manner. Hanun, the original cause
          of the war, who had so deeply insulted David, was either killed or driven out
          of the kingdom. In his stead David appointed his brother Shobi as king.
          Meanwhile Abishai had been engaged in a war against the Idumaean king, and had
          utterly routed him in the Valley of Salt—probably in the neighbourhood of the
          rock-salt mountain, near the Dead Sea. Eighteen thousand Idumaeans are said to
          have fallen there. The rest probably submitted; and for this reason David
          contented himself with placing excise officers and a garrison over them, as he
          had done in Damascus and the other Aramaean provinces. The Idumaeans, however,
          seem later on to have revolted against the Israelitish garrison and the tax
          collectors, and to have massacred them. Joab therefore repaired to Idumaea,
          caused the murdered Israelites to be buried, and all Idumaean males to be put
          to death. He was occupied with this war of destruction during half a year, and
          so thoroughly was the task executed that only a few of the male sex could save
          themselves by flight. Amongst them was a son or a grandson of the Idumaean king.
          
          
          
                     
        By
          these decisive victories, in the west over the Philistines, in the south over
          the Idumaeans, in the east (on the opposite side of the Jordan) over the
          Moabites and Ammonites, and in the north over the Aramaeans, David had raised
          the power of Israel to an unexpected degree. While, at the commencement of his
          reign, when he was first acknowledged king of all Israel, the boundaries of the
          country had been comprised between Dan and Beersheba, he now ruled over the
          widespread territory from the river of Egypt (Rhinokolura, El-Arish) to the
          Euphrates, or from Gaza to Thapsacus (on the Euphrates). The nations thus
          subdued were obliged annually to do homage by means of gifts, to pay tribute,
        and perhaps also to send serfs to assist in building and other severe labour. 
        These
          wars and victories were better calculated than his early hardships to bring to
          light the great qualities of David’s mind. Strong and determined as he was in
          every undertaking in which the honour and safety of his people were involved,
          he remained modest and humble, without a spark of presumption, after success
          had been attained. He erected no monument to commemorate his victories as had
          been done by Saul; like his general, Joab, he was imbued with the thought that
          to God alone was to be attributed the victory. The faith in God, to which David
          had given utterance when he prepared himself for the duel with the Rephaite
          Goliath (1 Samuel XVII. 47), he
            preserved in all great contests. David elaborated this guiding thought in a
            psalm, which he probably chanted before the ark at the close of the war, and in
            which he gives a retrospect of his entire past life.
            
            
              
                   
        In
          consequence of their great victories, two firm convictions were impressed on
          the minds of the people, and these actuated and possessed them in all times to
          come. The one idea occurs in various forms: “A king cannot escape by the
          multitude of his army, nor a warrior by his power; vain is the horse for
          safety”. God alone decides the fate of war, brings it to a close, gives victory
          or defeat, and “to Him it is equally easy to conquer with few or with many”.
          The other idea, in closest connection with it, is that God leads the armies of
          Israel to victory, if they go forth to glorify His name or to save His people.
          The God of Israel was, in accordance with this idea, designated by a special
          name which fully expresses this thought; He was named the God of hosts (Adonai
            Zebaoth), the God who gives victory unto Israel in its conflicts. The King
            Zebaoth was invoked before every battle, and the Israelitish troops went forth
            with the firm conviction that they could never be defeated. This confidence,
            certainly, worked wonders in the course of time.
            
            
              
               
        Severely
          as David treated the idols of the nations whom he had conquered, he behaved
          with comparative leniency to the conquered idolaters. The Moabites alone were
          cruelly punished, and the Ammonites were enslaved, but the other conquered
          races were merely obliged to pay tribute. The offences of the former must have
          been very great to have deserved so heavy a punishment. The foreign races
          residing in the country were not molested; thus we find Jebusites in Jerusalem,
          and Canaanites and Hittites in other parts of the country. Hence we find many
          strangers and natives not of Israelitish descent enrolled in his corps of
          warriors, or leading their own troops in his service. The Hittite Uriah, one of
          David’s thirty heroes, who was destined to play a melancholy part in David’s
          career, was deeply attached to the Israelitish nation.
          
          
          
             
        The
          joy over these great achievements remained, however, but for a short time
          unmarred. The happiness of a state, like that of individuals, is but seldom of
          long duration, and days of sunshine must be followed by periods of darkness, to
          prevent the enervation of the national vigour. By one false step David lost not
          only his own inward contentment and peace, but shook the very foundations of
          that state which it had cost him such exertions to establish. When David
          returned home from the Aramaean war, and was resting from the fatigues of
          battle, which Joab and his army were still undergoing in the land of Ammon, he
          beheld from the roof of his palace a beautiful woman, who was bathing. She was
          the wife of one of his most faithful warriors (the Hittite, Uriah), and her
          name was Bathsheba. The houses of the warriors were built on Zion in the
          vicinity of the king’s palace, and thus he happened to see Bathsheba. Carried
          away by his passion, he sent messengers to command her to repair to the palace,
          and Bathsheba obeyed. When David, some time after, found that this violation of
          the marriage tie had not been without consequences, his only thought was to
          save his honour, and thus he involved himself in deeper sin: He commanded Uriah
          to return to Jerusalem from the camp at Rabbah. He received him in a friendly
          manner, and gave him permission to rest, and enjoy the company of his wife.
          Uriah, however, made no use of this permission, but remained with the guard,
          who slept at the entrance of the king's palace, and protected his person. David
          was disappointed. He sought an escape from the dilemma, and this led him into a
          heinous crime. As he could not save his honour, he determined that Uriah should
          lose his life. David therefore sent him to the camp with a letter to Joab, saying
          that the bearer should be placed in a post of extreme danger—nay, of certain
          death—during one pf the sorties of the Ammonites. This command was fulfilled,
          and Uriah fell, struck dead by an Ammonite arrow. Bathsheba fulfilled the
          customary time of mourning for her husband, and was then received into the
          palace by David as his wife.
          
          
            
               
        In
          every other State the court circle would have discussed a king’s fancy with bated
          breath; it would hardly have been blamed, and certainly it would soon have been
          forgotten. But in Israel there was an eye which could pierce this factitious
          darkness, and a conscience which declaimed in a loud voice against the crimes
          of even a royal wrong-doer. Prophetism possessed this clear sight which never
          failed, and this conscience which never slept. It was its foremost duty not to
          allow sin to grow into a habit by hushing it up and screening it, but to expose
          it in glaring colors, and brand it with the stamp of public condemnation.
          
          
          
               
        David
          no doubt believed that Bathsheba alone was cognisant of his sin, and Joab the
          only accessory to the plot against Uriah’s life. But this error was suddenly
          and rudely dispelled. The prophet Nathan one day came to David, and requested
          permission to bring a certain case to his notice. He then related the following
          parable:—In a great city there lived a rich man, who possessed great flocks and
          herds; and near him lived a poor man who possessed but one little lamb, which
          he had reared for himself. One day, when a guest came to the rich man, he was
          too stingy to kill one of his flock for the meal, but he took the lamb of the
          poor man to feast his friend. On hearing this complaint, David’s sense of
          justice was aroused, and he said indignantly that the heartless rich man
          deserved to die, and should pay the poor man four times the value of the lamb.
          Then the prophet replied, “Thou art the man!”
          
          
          
                 
        Any
          other king would have punished the moralist who had dared speak the truth to a
          crowned head, to the representative of God on earth. David, however, the pupil
          of the prophet Samuel, when the picture of his misdeeds was thus placed before
          him, penitently answered, “Yes, I have sinned”. He certainly did not fail to
          offer up heartfelt prayers, and to make atonement in order to obtain God's
          forgiveness. The child which was born died in early infancy, although David had
          worn himself away in fasting and prayers for its life. Bathsheba afterwards had
          a second son named Jedidiah, or Solomon (1033), who
            became the favourite of his father.
            
            
              
                   
        But
          though God pardoned the king for his heinous sins, humanity did not forgive
          them, and they proved fatal to domestic peace. Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah,
          was the daughter of Eliam (one of David’s warriors), and the granddaughter of
          his counsellor Ahithophel. The father and grandfather felt their honour
          disgraced through their daughter’s seduction, which they could never forgive,
          although they kept silence, and did not betray their hatred. Ahithophel
          especially nursed his vengeance in secret, and only awaited an opportunity to
          wreak it on the king. David did all in his power to appease them. He elevated
          Bathsheba to the rank of first queen, promised her secretly that her son should
          be his successor, and solemnly swore to fulfil this promise. He wished at any
          cost to make peace with Ahithophel, whose counsel was precious to him.
          Ahithophel, however, remained immovable. A scandalous event in the house of
          David involved matters to a still greater extent, and robbed his remaining
          years of all tranquillity. His eldest son Amnon seduced his half-sister Tamar,
          and thereby aroused the fierce anger of her brother Absalom, who determined to
          avenge her. Each of the king’s sons, six of whom had been born in Hebron, and
          eleven, in Jerusalem, had, when he attained manhood, his own house, household
          and lands. Absalom’s lands and herds were situated at Baal-Hazor, not far from
          the capital. Thither he invited all the king’s sons to the feast of
          sheep-shearing. Whilst they and their guests were enjoying the feast, and drinking
          freely, Absalom’s servants, at their master's command, attacked Amnon, and
          dealt him his death-blow. Absalom served a double purpose by this murder. He
          avenged the insult offered to his sister, and hoped to secure his own
          succession to the throne by ridding himself of his elder brother. The son of
          Abigail, the second in succession, was already dead, and so it seemed
          inevitable that he, as the third son, must be the successor. David’s son a
          fratricide!—What will be the consequences of this bloody deed? Only his faith
          in God saved him from becoming, like his predecessor, a victim to insanity,
          although the dire fate which had befallen him was but too real, and not merely
          the effect of a distrustful imagination.
          
          
          
                 
        David’s
          first impulse was to seek out the murderer, who had taken refuge with his
          grandfather, King Talmai, of Geshur, on the south-west boundary of Judaea, in
          order to deal with him as he deserved, even at the risk of going to war on his
          account. But there were various influences at work against such a policy. In
          fact, since the affair with Bathsheba, intrigues had been rife at David’s
          court. Joab was opposed to the succession of the last-born, Solomon, and was
          naturally on the side of Absalom, the eldest surviving son. Ahithophel, David’s
          infallible counsellor, also favoured Absalom’s claim to the throne, because he
          could use him as a tool against his father. On the other hand, Adonijah,
          David’s fourth son, advocated the infliction of condign punishment on Absalom.
          Adonijah thought his prospects of displacing the infant Solomon fairer than his
          chance with the remorseless Absalom. If the latter were punished for
          fratricide, Adonijah would be the next in succession. He and his mother Haggith
          may perhaps, therefore, have incensed David against Absalom, but Joab and
          Ahithophel were wiser, and knew how to exert their influence in favour of
          abandoning all warlike attempts upon him or his grandfather, whose protection
          he was enjoying.
          
          
          
                   
        When
          David had at length decided on seizing or demanding the surrender of his guilty
          son (though he had been absent for three years), Joab employed a ruse to turn
          the king from his resolve. He sent for a woman living in the adjacent town of
          Tekoah, who had a reputation for adroit and clever speech. With her he devised
          a plan to make the king realise how horrible it was for a father to be willing
          to put to death a son for the not altogether unjustifiable murder of his
          brother. The wise woman of Tekoah consequently appeared before the king in
          mourning garments, and as though invoking his mercy she called out in an
          entreating voice and with deep prostrations, Help! O king, help! When she
          stated her fictitious case, the king readily recognised the hidden point of her
          story, and the allusion to his own case, and he demanded an open answer from
          her as to whether Joab had assisted her in her disguise and invention. When the
          woman of Tekoah had confessed the truth, the king. sent for Joab, and assured
          him that he no longer entertained evil intentions against Absalom, and assigned
          to him the task of conducting his son to Jerusalem. The woman of Tekoah had, in
          her ingenious manner, made it clear to him that blood-revenge against his own
          son would be a contradiction in itself.
          
          
          
                     
        Joab himself
          brought Absalom from Geshur to Jerusalem. The son, however, was not permitted
          to appear before his father, but was obliged to remain in his own house. By
          this means Joab unconsciously sowed the seeds of dissension in the house of
          David. Night and day, Absalom, in his isolation and disgrace, brooded over the
          vile plan of deposing his father. But he dissembled in order to lull the
          latter’s suspicion. To this end it was absolutely necessary that a
          reconciliation should be effected. Joab, who earnestly desired peace between
          father and son, became the mediator, and David decided that, after a two years'
          exile from his presence, his son might now be allowed to return. At this
          meeting, Absalom played to perfection the part of the penitent, obedient son;
          David then gave him a fatherly embrace, and the reconciliation was complete.
          Seven years had passed since the death of Amnon. But now Absalom’s intrigues
          commenced. No doubt he had frequent meetings with Ahithophel, and was following
          his advice. He obtained chariots and horses from Egypt, procured a guard of
          fifty men, and displayed regal grandeur. He arose betimes in the morning,
          listened to disputes, and found every one’s case just, but regretted that the
          king would not listen to all, and would not give justice to all. He hinted that
          were he the judge, no one would have to complain of difficulty in obtaining his
          dues. Absalom pursued this course for four years after the reconciliation with
          his father. He was the handsomest man of his times. He was then about thirty,
          and in the full pride of his strength. His beautiful thick hair fell in waves
          over his neck and shoulders, like the mane of a lion. His affability won him
          the hearts of all who approached him. David was so blinded that he did not see
          how his crafty son was alienating the affections of the people from their
          sovereign, whilst Absalom merely awaited a favourable opportunity to proceed
          against his father, to dethrone him, and perhaps to attempt his life. This
          opportunity soon offered itself.
                
          
          
                       
        It
          appears that David was occupied, in the last decade of his reign, with a
          comprehensive plan, apparently that of a great war which would require a
          numerous body of soldiers. He had already enlisted bands of mercenaries, six
          hundred Hittites, who, with their general Ittai, (whose admiration for David
          secured his unswerving attachment), had arrived from Gath. The king also wished
          to ascertain the number of able-bodied men over twenty years of age in all the
          Israelitish tribes, in order to determine whether he could undertake with their
          aid a campaign which would probably prove severe and tedious. The king
          delegated the office of numbering the men who could bear arms to his
          commander-in-chief, Joab, and the other generals. The work of enumeration
          lasted nine months and twenty days. From the numbers which were handed in,
          supposing them to be correct, it appears that, out of an entire population of 4,000,000, there
            were 1,300,000 men and youths capable of bearing arms.
              
              
                
                     
        This
          counting of the nation, however, proved to be a mistake for which David had to
          pay heavily. The people were highly incensed against him. In itself the act was
          displeasing to them, as they saw in it the preliminaries to enlistments for a
          war of long duration; added to this was the fear that the counting itself must
          be attended by evil results, for such was the view held in those days. A
          fearful pestilence broke out, which carried off great numbers, and confirmed
          all minds in the belief that it had arisen in consequence of the numbering of
          the people. The capital, being densely populated, naturally suffered the
          greatest loss from the pestilence. On seeing the heaps of corpses, or, to speak
          in the metaphorical language of those days, at sight of “the angel of
          Destruction” that had snatched away so many, David exclaimed:—“I have sinned
          and done wrong, but what has my poor flock done? Let thy hand strike me and the
          house of my fathers”. The plague having spared Mount Moriah, where the
          Jebusites had settled, the prophet Gad bade the king erect an altar, and offer
          up sacrifices on that mountain, and he announced that the pestilence would then
          be averted from Jerusalem. Without hesitation, David and his entire court
          repaired thither. When the chief of the Jebusites, Ornah (Araunah), saw David
          approaching, he hurried to meet him, saluted him humbly, and asked what was his
          desire. David then informed him that he wished to buy the mountain in order to
          build an altar on it. Ornah graciously offered him the spot and all
          appertaining to it as a gift, but David refused to accept it. No sooner was an
          altar hastily erected there and a sacrifice offered, than the pestilence ceased
          in Jerusalem. From that time Mount Moriah was considered a sacred spot, which
          destruction could not approach; it was also the mountain on which Abraham was
          supposed to have offered his son Isaac as a sacrifice.
          
          
          
                     
        In
          consequence of this plague the nation conceived a dislike to David; it
          condemned him for the loss of the thousands of human beings whom the Angel of
          Destruction had snatched away. Ahithophel made use of this dislike in order to
          avenge himself on David, and he employed Absalom as his tool, and, with him,
          contrived a conspiracy which could not fail to succeed.
          
          
          
                       
        Absalom
          secretly despatched messengers in every direction, in order to give those
          adherents who were already attached to him the necessary signal. The
          insurrection was to be set on foot in Hebron, an outpost of the tribe of Judah,
          whose elders had already been won for Absalom. The latter invented subterfuges
          by which to deceive David as to the true purpose of his visit to Hebron, and
          the king permitted him to depart without suspicion.
          
          
          
                         
        Absalom
          arrived at Hebron, attended by his friends and guards, and by two hundred
          prominent men of Jerusalem, whom he had invited under some pretext, and who did
          not suspect his real aims. These two hundred men, through their very ignorance
          of matters, contributed to the success of the project. The people of Hebron,
          seeing that even prominent men had joined Absalom’s party, gave up David’s
          cause as lost. Ahithophel, who had likewise invented a pretext to absent
          himself from court, openly declared for Absalom, thus giving his cause an
          immense accession of power, as he was known to be David’s right hand.
                
          
          
                           
        The
          traitorous plan succeeded but too well. The Hebronites and others present
          saluted Absalom as king, forswore their allegiance to David, and sacrificed
          burnt-offerings. Ambition prompted various members of David’s family also to
          join Absalom. This was more especially the case with Amasa, his cousin, who
          considered himself a great commander, and thought that Joab had unjustly been
          preferred to him. The messengers then gave the signal previously agreed upon,
          and the conspirators who sided with Absalom gathered together, and shouted
          “Long live King Absalom!”. They carried with them all who had been incensed
          against David for taking a census of the people, and in fact all who hoped to
          gain some advantage from changes and dissension. The Benjamites, whom the accession
          of David had deprived of supremacy, and the everdissatisfied Ephraimites, were
          more particularly delighted at David’s downfall, and willingly did homage to
          the usurper; they hoped to regain their former freedom through David’s
          misfortunes. They had greater chances of obtaining power under Absalom, who was
          very vain, and not likely to retain the favour of the nation for a long time,
          than under the rule of David. The chief towns of all the tribes sent
          ambassadors to Hebron to salute the new king, and his adherents daily increased
          in number. At first the conspiracy was kept secret from those in authority; no
          one was permitted to journey to Jerusalem, lest the news spread. David received
          the information of his own dethronement and the accession of his son
          simultaneously with the news that the houses of Judah and Israel had renounced
          their allegiance to him.
                
          
          
                           
        It
          was a terrible blow for the king. But his resolve was soon taken; he would not
          resort to a civil war, as the sons of Zeruiah and many other faithful followers
          probably urged him to do. Deserted by all the tribes, he would be obliged to
          shut himself up in his capital. The city would not be able to resist the attack
          of so large an army; and he saw, now that he was undeceived, that Absalom would
          not scruple to turn Jerusalem into a sea of blood. David felt deeply wounded by
          the alliance of Ahithophel with his usurping son, and he was greatly
          discouraged by it. He saw, too late, that the conspiracy was of long standing,
          that the plan had been maturely considered, and that resistance on his part
          would only lead to his own destruction. He therefore announced to his people
          that he would depart from Jerusalem in all haste, before Absalom could leave
          Hebron with his numerous followers.
          
          
          
                           
        This
          step was instrumental in proving to David that he still had faithful friends,
          who would be true to him till death. When, on leaving his palace, he passed the
          Place of the Sellers of Ointment, he observed to his great joy that a great
          concourse followed him. Not only his general, Joab, with his brother, Abishai,
          and their followers; not only a great number of the warrior-corps (Gibborim),
          the hired troops, Cherethites and Pelethites, with Benaiah their leader, but
          also the Hittite, with six hundred men, whom David had only a short time before
          enlisted. The entire population wept aloud, whilst David withdrew to the Vale
          of Kedron, where he mustered his followers before taking the road over the
          Mount of Olives to the desert near the Jordan. He did not venture to take
          refuge in a city from fear of treachery.
          
          
          
                           
        Later
          on the two high priests Zadok and Abiathar with all the Levites hurried after
          him, bearing the ark of the covenant with them. David, however, urged the
          priests to return to Zion with the ark, saying, “If by God’s mercy I shall be
          permitted to return to Jerusalem, then I shall again behold the ark of the
          covenant and the sanctuary; if not, if God rejects me, I am ready to endure
          what seemeth good unto Him”. It also appeared to him that the priests could be
          of more service to him if they remained in Jerusalem than if they joined him
          in exile. Whilst, then, the priests hastily took the ark back to Jerusalem,
          David ascended the Mount of Olives barefoot, his head covered, and his face
          bathed in tears. All his attendants wept bitterly. But when his grief and
          despair had reached their climax, a friend, who was to give him help, came from
          the other side of the Mount of Olives, and met him at its highest point. Hushai
          from the city of Erech was a confidant of David, and a counsellor of no less
          wisdom than Ahithophel. He advanced in mourning array, his garments torn, and
          earth upon his head, prepared to share the king’s flight. David, however,
          refused to permit this, because, being an aged man, he would only be a burden.
          In Absalom’s vicinity he might do valiant service by counteracting Ahithophel’s
          counsels, and by keeping David informed of all that occurred. Hushai therefore
          repaired to Jerusalem.
                
          
          
                           
        The
          first town through which David passed in his flight was the Benjamite city of
          Bahurim. Far from meeting with a friendly reception there, he was received with
          insult and neglect. A Benjamite named Shimei, of the house of Gera, reviled and
          cursed him, saying, “Thou outcast and man of blood, God will repay thee for thy
          treatment of the house of Saul, whose crown thou hast stolen”. He followed
          David's march for a long distance, throwing stones and earth at him, so that
          the soldiers had to shield the king. David, however, had some friends in
          Bahurim also. Humbled and exhausted, the king at length accomplished the
          journey through the desert, and reached the neighbourhood of Jericho with his
          forces.
                
          
          
                           
        Here
          he could recruit his energies after his recent bodily and mental exertions,
          while awaiting the news which his faithful adherents would transmit to him from
          Jerusalem.
          
          
          
                           
        When
          David was approaching the banks of the Jordan, Absalom arrived in Jerusalem
          with his traitorous adherents, among them Ahithophel, the faithless counsellor.
          Ahithophel urged the usurper to commit ever greater crimes in order to widen
          the breach between him and his father, and render a reconciliation impossible;
          he advised him to take possession of his father’s harem. It mattered little to
          Ahithophel that Absalom would incur the hatred of the people through this fresh
          misdeed. His sole object was to revenge himself on David, and to ruin him. The
          weakminded sinner who called himself king, and who was incapable of undertaking
          anything, unless incited thereto by others, allowed himself to be induced to
          commit this crime. But, whilst Absalom was revelling in sin, the man who was
          destined to frustrate all his ruthless plans was near at hand. Hushai had
          apparently submitted to the new king, and had assured him that he would serve
          him as faithfully as he had served his father, and Absalom relied on this promise.
          He called a council to consider the most expedient plan for defeating and
          ruining his father. The elders of the tribes, who were in the city, were
          invited to attend. Ahithophel gave the diabolical advice to attack David that
          very night with a strong army, to disperse his following in a sudden onslaught
          made by a force its superior in point of numbers, and to capture and slay the
          king, whom he imagined to be utterly worn out and dispirited. But Absalom also
          consulted Hushai with regard to the campaign against his father, and
          Ahithophel’s advice was rejected by him as impracticable. Hushai urged such
          plausible objections that Absalom was duped by them; he advised that David
          should not be attacked with a small force, but that Absalom should raise from
          the entire nation—from Dan to Beersheba— an army whose numbers would render it
          irresistible. Hushai’s advice was more favourably received than Ahithophel’s,
          and steps were forthwith taken to act upon it. The attack was postponed, and
          the campaign was deferred till the numerous forces could be assembled. Hushai
          immediately conveyed the results of the meeting to David by means of Jonathan
          and Ahimaaz, the sons of the High Priest.
          
          
          
                           
        The
          first result of these events was favourable to the cause of David, for
          Ahithophel departed from Jerusalem, and hanged himself in his native town of
          Gilo. He was led to this course either by disgust at Absalom’s conduct in
          setting aside his counsel, or by the conviction that Absalom’s cause would be
          lost through delay, and that he himself would reap well-deserved punishment.
          This suicide was a severe blow to the usurper, for he had no capable man
          amongst his followers, and he himself was neither warlike nor prudent. His
          general Amasa had but little military genius. The enrolment of soldiers was
          actually begun, but before it could be completed David had obtained an
          important advantage. He went to Mahanaim, the inhabitants of which town
          received him with a welcome as cordial as that which in former times they had
          extended to the fugitive son of Saul. All the Israelites on the opposite side
          of the Jordan offered their assistance, and placed themselves under his
          command. Two men of Gilead outvied each other in attentions to the unhappy king
          and father, and provided him and his followers with all necessaries. They were
          old men—Barzillai from Rogelim, and Machir from Lodebar—and help came also from
          Shobi, king of Ammon, the son of Nahash. When at length Absalom or Amasa had
          succeeded in collecting a large force, they crossed the Jordan by means of
          rafts, and approached Mahanaim. The Absalomites encamped opposite the wood
          without any particular plan or order. David, on the other hand, divided his
          army into three divisions, commanded respectively by Joab, Abishai and Ittai,
          who were all proved and competent soldiers. David himself was not permitted to
          accompany them, as his generals knew too well his love for his wicked son. The
          contest cost many human lives. Although Absalom’s forces exceeded those of
          David in point of numbers, yet they were defeated, for they were not well
          disciplined, and were not able to find their way in the forest. David’s troops,
          on the other hand, fought valiantly. The forest was more destructive than the
          sword. Twenty thousand warriors are said to have fallen there. The forest of
          Rephaim was also the cause of Absalom’s personal destruction. His long hair, of
          which he was very vain, caught in the branches of an oak, and the mule he had
          been riding galloped away. It seems providential that the death-blow was dealt
          by Joab, who had formerly favoured him, and who had thus unwittingly assisted
          him in his conspiracy. Joab then sounded the horn as a signal for David’s army
          to cease from the contest, and the adherents of Absalom took to flight, and
          crossed the Jordan.
          
          
          
                           
        Thus
          ended the second civil war of David’s reign, a war which was the more unnatural
          because of the close relationship between the rival combatants, and the sad
          causes which led to the contest. The first duty of the victors was to transmit
          the news of their triumph to David. This was in itself a painful office, for
          all knew how deeply David would feel the death of his wicked son. David was
          terrified at the news, wept and sobbed, and cried repeatedly, “My son, my son,
          Absalom; would, I had fallen instead of thee!”. The depths of a father’s heart
          are unsearchable. Perhaps, he considered Absalom in the light of a victim whom
          Ahithophel had inveigled and urged on to rebellion. The warriors dared not
          enter Mahanaim as victors, but repaired homewards stealthily, as though
          humiliated after a defeat. David would see and speak to no one, but mourned
          continually for his son’s loss. At length Joab took heart, and reproached him
          in harsh terms for indulging in continued mourning, and thereby manifesting
          ingratitude towards his soldiers. In order to rouse the king, Joab further
          threatened that if he did not immediately show himself to his soldiers, and
          address them kindly, his faithful followers would leave the same night, and he
          would remain alone and helpless. These sharp words of the rough but faithful
          Joab induced David to rouse himself, and appear before the people. The corpse
          of Absalom was thrown into a cave, and covered with a heap of stones. He left a
          beautiful daughter, but his three sons had been snatched away by death before
          his revolt, as though it were destined that no son of his should witness the
          attempt against his father’s life. During his short reign at Jerusalem, he had
          erected a splendid monument in the “King’s Valley”, to perpetuate his own name.
          Intended for his glorification, it became the commemoration of his disgrace.
          After the close of the war, David contemplated returning to Jerusalem. He did
          not wish, however, to force the tribes into submission, he preferred to await
          their repentant return to him, and the renewal of their oaths of allegiance. It
          was a curious fact that the tribes of the north were the first to take this
          course. The voice of the people appealed to the elders to lead them back to
          their king. They cried, “The king who delivered us from our enemies, and freed
          us from the yoke of the Philistines, was forced by Absalom to flee from his own
          country. Absalom is now dead. Why do you not hasten to bring back our king?
          Come, let us lead him home”. Thereupon the elders of the tribes invited David
          to return to his capital; and thus, a second time, they acknowledged him as
          king. Contrary to all expectation, the tribe of Judah, and naturally the tribe
          of Benjamin were still holding back. They did not move one step to welcome
          their king. Probably the men of Judah felt bitterly ashamed of the revolt they
          had started in Hebron, and did not venture to entreat David’s pardon. Perhaps,
          too, the discontent which had incited them to forswear their allegiance was
          still at work amongst them. It seems that Amasa, who had fled to Jerusalem
          after the defeat in the forest of Gilead, still exercised great influence over
          the men of Judah.
          
          
          
                           
        When
          David saw that the tribe of Judah was still holding aloof from him, he
          commanded the two priests, Zadok and Abiathar, who had remained in Jerusalem,
          to admonish the elders of Judah to invite their king to return. He told the
          priests to assure Amasa that he would not only receive a free pardon, but even
          retain his rank as general. With this prospect before him, Amasa determined to
          accept David’s offers, and he persuaded the elders to accede to the king's
          proposal. The men of Judah thereupon sent an invitation to David, and an
          embassy went forth to meet the king, and receive him at Gilgal. The men of
          Benjamin were sorely puzzled by this conduct. What were they to do? The
          Benjamites had publicly shown themselves inimical to David when he had fled
          from Jerusalem through their territory; they had not thought it possible that
          he would ever return, and reclaim his throne. Now affairs had changed, and not
          only the northern tribes, but even Judah was preparing to do him homage. The
          Benjamites felt no attachment to David, but they could not isolate themselves,
          for then the king’s wrath would fall heavily on them. Shimei, whose insults had
          caused David such bitter pain during his flight, and who, in consequence, had
          most cause to fear the king’s anger, advised that they should display intense
          enthusiasm for David’s cause, exceeding that of the other tribes, since, by
          appealing to his generosity, they might incline him favourably towards them. In
          obedience to this advice, one thousand Benjamites went forward to meet David,
          joined the Judaean embassy, and, on arriving at the bank of the Jordan, threw a
          bridge across the river in order to facilitate the king’s transit. Meanwhile
          the king had left Mahanaim, and was approaching the Jordan, attended by his
          court, his servants, and the faithful followers who had joined him on the
          opposite shore. Shimei advanced before all the others, threw himself at the
          king’s feet as he was about to cross the river, acknowledged his fault, and
          entreated David's forgiveness. David now returned with a larger concourse of
          followers than had accompanied him on his flight across the Jordan: he was
          attended by the Judaean embassy, by a thousand Benjamites, and by the faithful
          friends who formed his guard of honour. The first town reached after crossing
          the Jordan was Gilgal. Here the ambassadors of the different tribes on this
          side of the river were assembled to renew their homage; they felt surprised and
          annoyed that the Judaeans had stolen a march on them by meeting the king at
          the very shore of the Jordan. They saw in this eager display of loyalty, which
          they could not consider sincere, an effort on the part of the house of Judah to
          regain the king’s favour, to the detriment of the house of Israel.
          
          
          
                           
        The
          elders of Israel made no secret of their displeasure, and gave vent to it in
          David’s presence; the Judaeans, however, retaliated on them. The question of
          precedency degenerated into a violent quarrel, the Judaeans making angry
          retorts, thus offending the northern tribes still more. Bitter animosity arose
          between the contending parties; David appears to have inclined to the side of
          the Judaeans. Sheba, a Benjamite of the family of Bichri, taking advantage of
          the general confusion, sounded the trumpet and cried, “We have no portion in
          David, and no share in the son of Jesse; let every Israelite return to his
          tent”. Heeding this cry, the elders of the northern tribes withdrew, and
          followed Sheba the Bichrite. The men of Judah alone remained faithful to David,
          and accompanied him to Jerusalem. The joy of their return was mingled with
          annoyance: a fresh breach had arisen, a civil war was imminent. At this sad
          juncture David had recourse to a step which may be considered either very wise
          or very foolish.   Joab had become obnoxious to him since the
          king had learned that he had killed Absalom, and David did not wish him to fill
          the office of general any longer. Besides this, he desired to keep his word
          with Amasa, and to appoint him to the office of commander-in-chief. David,
          being now dependent on the tribe of Judah, felt the necessity of retaining
          Amasa’s good-will, as the latter's influence had immense weight with the
          Judaeans. Without consulting Joab, he commanded Amasa to summon the forces of
          the tribe of Judah within three days, in order to proceed against the rebels.
          The time expired, and Amasa did not return. David became uneasy; he thought
          Amasa might have deceived him, and made common cause with the insurgents. It
          was necessary to be expeditious, lest Sheba’s followers increase in numbers,
          and also gain time to occupy fortified cities. David had no choice but to turn
          to the sons of Zeruiah, who, in their unswerving fidelity, had remained true to
          him in spite of frequent slights, and whose skill in matters of war he had
          amply tested. David would not, however, give the supreme command to Joab, but
          entrusted it to his brother Abishai. He set out with the Cherethites and
          Pelethites, who were to form the nucleus of the army which he hoped to collect
          on the way. Joab overlooked the insult which had been offered him, and joined
          the troops, or rather became their leader. He appears to have issued an appeal
          to the people to gather around him. When Amasa joined them in Gibeon, Joab
          killed him with one stroke of his sword, and the Judaeans, whom Amasa had
          collected, followed the sons of Zeruiah. In all the towns, fresh partisans and
          followers attached themselves to David’s cause. Sheba found but few adherents,
          the northern tribes being unwilling to begin a civil war for the sake of a man
          who was but little known, and who was followed only by a small band of
          soldiers. He had thrown himself into the fortified town of Abel, and a part of
          his followers occupied the town of Dan, which lay at an hour’s distance from
          the base of Mount Hermon, not far from the source of the Jordan. Joab quickly
          ordered a trench to be dug round the town of Abel, and without calling on the
          inhabitants to surrender, he began to undermine the walls. The inhabitants
          became greatly alarmed. Then a wise woman called from the wall to the sappers
          below to summon Joab. When he approached, she addressed him reproachfully,
          “Thou shouldst have asked first in Abel and Dan that thou mightest have heard,
          whether all those who are faithful and peace-loving have departed from Israel.
          Why wilt thou slaughter the mothers and the children of Israel? Why wilt thou
          destroy the inheritance of Jacob?”. Joab replied that
            he did not wish to do this, that he merely desired to capture the man who had
            lifted his hand against the king. On this the woman promised that the head of
            the rebel should soon be thrown over the wall. She kept her word, for she
            secretly persuaded her fellow-citizens to separate Sheba from his few
            followers, and to kill him. His gory head was cast over the wall, and Joab
            raised the siege, dismissed his soldiers, and returned to Jerusalem with the
            news of his victory. The king was obliged, against his will, to leave him in
            command of the army.
                 
        David
          returned to his capital with a purged soul. He had suffered and atoned heavily
          for his sins. He had taken away the wife of his faithful servant, and his son
          had taken away his wives. He had spilt Uriah’s blood, and the streams of bloodshed in his
            own house had almost overwhelmed him. He had found by bitter experience that
            even the best king cannot build on his peoples love. His plan of undertaking a
            great war against his heathen foes was shattered. He, therefore, in his old
            age, during the last years of his reign, confined his attention to the internal
            affairs of his kingdom. He wished to carry out, before death overtook him, an
            idea he had long cherished. He wished to build a magnificent temple to the God
            of Israel, who had rescued him in his many troubles. Before commencing, David
            consulted Nathan, the prophet; for in those days the prophet ranked higher than
            the priest. He said, “I live in a palace of cedar wood, whilst the Ark of God
            is only in a temporary tent. I will build a temple of cedar for it!”. Nathan
            approved the plan and said, “Carry out all that is in thy heart, for God is
            with thee!”. The next day, however, the prophet came to him, and revealed to
            David that he was not destined to build a temple, because he had shed blood,
            but that this task would be reserved for his son. At the same time David was
            informed that his throne was established for many years to come,—that a long
            succession of kings would descend from him, and occupy his throne, provided
            that they walked in the ways of God. Much as David had wished to build a
            stately temple in Jerusalem, he bowed humbly to the divine decree revealed to
            him by Nathan, and gave up his project. Before the ark of the covenant, he
            thanked God in a heartfelt prayer for the mercies bestowed on him, who had been
            raised up from the dust. His heart was filled with gratitude that his royal
            house and his throne were to be established for many years to come. David gave
            expression to this feeling in a psalm, which, however, has not the same verve as
            his former songs; it was, perhaps, his last poetic prayer. 
        Although
          David did not commence the erection of the temple himself, he began to make the
          necessary preparations. He devoted to the sanctuary a part of the booty which
          he had acquired from the conquered nations. He also regulated the order in
          which divine services were to be conducted, by having, according to Samuel's
          method, choirs of Levites to play on the harp and sing psalms, in addition to
          the ordinary sacrificial rites. He is also considered the inventor of the
          various musical instruments which were later on introduced into the service.
          
            
            
               
        David’s
          vital energy began to decrease before he had attained his seventy-first year.
          The anxieties of his youth, the constant warfare, the exciting events in his
          own family, Amnon’s sinfulness and Absalom’s revolt caused him to grow old at a
          comparatively early age. He felt no warmth in his body; he felt cold despite
          the torrid heat of Jerusalem, and all the clothes which he could procure did
          not seem to supply him with the necessary vital heat.
          
          
          
               
        Adonijah,
          the king's fourth son, endeavoured, by taking advantage of David’s failing
          powers, to secure the succession. He was the next heir after Amnon and Absalom,
          but he feared that he might be passed over if he awaited the death of his
          father, and he had probably heard of the secret understanding, according to
          which the son of Bathsheba, his youngest brother, was to succeed to the throne.
          Adonijah had no desire to rebel against his father as Absalom had done, he
          merely wished to have his right to the succession recognised by the chief
          dignitaries of the kingdom. He therefore took counsel with those of David’s
          court who were opposed to Solomon’s succession. Foremost amongst these was
          Joab, who supported him as he had formerly supported Absalom. Adonijah’s other
          confidant was Abiathar, the second of the high priests, who seems to have been
          placed in an inferior position by David. Zadok, whose family had been appointed
          hereditary high priests by Saul at Gibeon, had been retained in that position
          by David, who wished to secure his support, and therefore bestowed upon him the
          highest rank in the sanctuary. Abiathar may have felt hurt by this neglect, and
          perhaps took the part of Adonijah in order to secure the position he could not
          hope to obtain under Solomon. The other sons of the king also wished to see the
          throne assured to Adonijah, and thus intrigues at the court commenced afresh.
          Adonijah was as handsome arid as popular as Absalom had been, and also, it
          appears, as thoughtless and as unfit for governing. Like Absalom, he began to
          draw the eyes of the people upon himself by a truly royal display; he procured
          chariots and attendants on horseback, and kept a guard of fifty runners, who
          preceded him wherever he went. David was weak in his behaviour to him, as he
          had been to Absalom—permitted him to have his own way, and thus tacitly
          acknowledged him as his successor. One day Adonijah invited his confidants,
          Joab, Abiathar, and all the king’s sons excepting Solomon, to a meeting. They
          offered up sacrifices near a well, and during the feast his followers cried,
          “Long live King Adonijah!”.
          
          
          
                 
        The
          first to take exception to Adonijah’s proceedings was Nathan the prophet. He
          knew of the secret promise, given by David to his wife Bathsheba, that Solomon
          should inherit the crown. He had also revealed to David that Solomon was
          appointed by God to be his successor. He seems to have had confidence in
          Solomon's character, and to have expected better things from him than from
          Adonijah. Nathan, therefore, went to Bathsheba, and they devised a plan by
          which Adonijah’s scheme might be overthrown. Bathsheba then repaired to the
          king, reminded him of his oath, and directed his attention to the fact that, in
          the event of Adonijah’s succession, she and her son both would be lost, and her
          marriage would be branded with ignominy.
          
          
          
                   
        Hardly
          had she ended the description of the sad fate which awaited her if Solomon’s
          claims were set aside, when the prophet Nathan was announced, and confirmed her
          assertions. David's resolve was quickly taken, and carried into effect on the
          same day, for he was most anxious to keep his oath to leave the sceptre to
          Solomon. He called upon the dignitaries who had not conspired with Adonijah, on
          Zadok, Benaiah and the warriors, and announced to them his resolve that Solomon
          should be anointed king during his own lifetime, and they all solemnly promised
          to acknowledge Solomon. Thereupon, David summoned the Cherethites and
          Pelethites to attend his son. Solomon then mounted one of the royal mules, and
          proceeded to the valley of Gihon, to the west of the town. A crowd of people
          joined the procession, and when the high-priest Zadok and the prophet Nathan
          had anointed him with oil from the tent of the sanctuary, the soldiers blew
          their trumpets, and all the people cried, “Long live King Solomon!”
          
          
          
                     
        Great
          excitement now prevailed in Jerusalem. While the eastern mountains echoed with
          the cry of “Long live King Adonijah!” the western chain was resounding with
          shouts of “Long live King Solomon!”. Had both the king’s sons and their
          adherents remained obstinate, a civil war must have ensued. But Adonijah was
          not like Absalom—he did not wish to excite a rebellion. Nor would his chief
          supporters, Joab and Abiathar, have assisted him in such an attempt. No sooner
          did Adonijah hear that Solomon had been anointed king by his father’s command
          than his courage failed him. He hastened to the sanctuary at Zion in order to
          seek refuge in the holy of holies. Solomon, however, who had immediately taken
          the reins of government, sent to inform him that he might leave the sanctuary,
          that not a hair of his head should be touched so long as he did not attempt any
          fresh revolt. Adonijah then repaired to the young king, paid him due homage,
          and was dismissed with presents. Thus the contest for the succession ended.
          
          
          
                       
        Davi’s
          weakness gradually increased, until after a stormy reign of forty years and six
          months (1015), he expired peacefully. He was the first to occupy a place in the royal
            mausoleum which he had built in a rocky cave on the southern slope of Mount
            Zion.
            
            
              
                   
        David’s
          death was deeply mourned. He had made the nation great, independent and happy,
          and death transfigured him. When he had passed away, the nation began to
          realise the true value of his work, and what he had been to them. He had
          reunited the various tribes, each of which had before followed its own special
          interests, and he formed them into one nation. The revolts of Absalom and Sheba
          proved sufficiently how strong the feeling had become which bound the tribes
          together. The house of Israel did not seize the opportunity offered by his
          death of severing itself from the house of Judah, and great as was their
          jealousy of each other, they held together. David had removed every inducement
          for party divisions, and had knit them together with a kind but firm hand.
          During his reign the priesthood and the prophets worked amicably together. Thus
          Solomon was anointed by the high priest Zadok in conjunction with the prophet
          Nathan. David maintained friendly relations between the priestly houses of
          Eleazar and Ithamar, represented by Zadok and Abiathar respectively. The nation
          had no reason to complain of oppression, for he dealt justly to the extent of
          his ability. By destroying the power of the Philistines, who had so long held
          the neighbouring tribes in subjection, and by conquering the nations inhabiting
          the banks of the Euphrates, he had not only established internal prosperity,
          but had also founded a great empire which could vie in power with Egypt, and
          had cast into the shade the Chaldean and Assyrian kingdoms on the Euphrates and
          the Tigris. By this means he had roused the people to the proud consciousness
          that it constituted a mighty nation of the Lord, the possessor of the law of
          God, the superior of the neighbouring nations. David’s sins were gradually
          forgotten, for his atonement had been both grievous and manifold. Posterity
          pronounced a milder judgment on him than did his contemporaries. The
          remembrance of his great deeds, his kindness, his obedience to God, caused him
          to appear invested with the traits of an ideal king, who served as a pattern to
          all later rulers,—one who had always walked in the ways of God, and never
          departed therefrom. The kings of his house who succeeded him were measured by
          his standard, and were judged by the extent of their resemblance to him.
          
          
          
                 
        David’s
          reign shone through the ages as perfect,—as one in which power and humility,
          fear of God and peace were united. Every succeeding century added its tribute
          to David’s character, until he became the ideal of a virtuous king and sacred
          poet.
          
          
          
         
          
        SOLOMON (970-931 BC) 
          
        
          
        DAVID had left affairs in Israel in such perfect
          order that his successor, unless he were a fool or a knave, or the victim of
          evil advice, would have but little trouble in governing. Solomon, however,
          carried David's work still further. He shed such lustre upon Israel that even
          the most distant generations basked in the light that emanated from his wise
          rule. Indeed, a king who solidifies and increases, if he does not actually
          found, the greatness of the State; who permits his people the enjoyment of
          peace; who sheds the bounties of plenty over his land, driving poverty away
          from the meanest hovel; who opens up new channels for the development of his
          people's powers, and who thus increases and strengthens them; a king who has
          the intelligence to arouse his subjects to exercise their mental gifts, and
          cultivate their love of the beautiful; who, by his material and spiritual
          creations, elevates his country to the dignity of a model State, such as had
          never been before him and scarcely ever after him;—such a monarch assuredly
          deserves the high praise which posterity has accorded to him. Carried away by
          the greatness of his deeds—for all these grand characteristics were strikingly
          prominent in Solomon—men shut their eyes to his weaknesses, and considered them
          the inevitable result of human imperfection. In the first place he strove to
          preserve peace for his country, though his father had left him ample means for
          making fresh conquests. He was called the king of peace—“Shelomo”.
          By giving to his people the comforts of prosperity, he widened its horizon, and
          raised its self-respect. He ruled it with wisdom and justice, and decided with
          strict impartiality all contests between individuals as well as tribes. He
          increased the number of towns, and secured the safety of the roads and of the
          caravans. He filled the city of Jerusalem with splendour, and built therein a
          magnificent temple in honour of God. He himself cultivated the fine arts and
          poetry, and thereby endowed them with fresh attractions in the eyes of the people.
          Lastly, he set great aims before the nation, and was rightly called the wise
          king.
          
         
        History, the impartial arbitress, cannot, however, be
          blinded by his dazzling virtues to the blemishes which attach to his
          government, and which must be accounted the cause of the unfortunate breach
          which commenced when his grave was scarcely closed. The beginning of Solomon’s
          rule was not free from stains of blood, and its end was clouded with mists,
          which dimmed its brightness; his love of splendour became injurious to
          morality; it made him despotic, and imposed a burden on the people, which it
          bore for a considerable time, but shook off at the first favourable
          opportunity. Solomon converted the kingly power into an autocracy, under which
          every will had to be subservient to his. But these blemishes were entirely
          hidden by the greatness of the achievements under his rule. It is impossible
          now to decide how far the responsibility of Solomon for these evils goes, how
          much of the blame rests with his too officious servants, and to what extent
          their existence must be attributed to the irresistible force of circumstances,
          to which the exalted and the lowly-alike must submit. It is the curse of
          crowned heads that the worthiest wearer of a crown, in order to consolidate his
          power, is induced to take steps which his conscience would under other
          circumstances condemn, and the misdeeds of his servants are also added to his
          account.
          
         
        Solomon was young—scarcely twenty—when he ascended the
          throne. After his accession, whilst visiting the altar at Gibeon, we are told,
          he had a vision in which God asked him to express the innermost wish of his
          heart, with the promise that it should be fulfilled. He did not choose long
          life, nor riches, nor honour, nor the death of his enemies; but he chose
          wisdom, in order that he might rule his people with justice. In fact, this
          wisdom, this power of entering into the feelings and minds of the dissenting parties
          who appeared before him, of seizing on the true state of the case in spite of
          exaggeration and subtle arguments, Solomon possessed to an extraordinary
          degree. The Solomonic judgment is well known. By giving a verdict which was
          well adapted to reveal the real feeling of a mother, he recognised, in a
          dispute between two women for the possession of a child, on which side was
          truth, on which side falsehood. “Cut the child in half”, he said. But its real
          mother could not accept this decision, and offered rather to give up her child.
          He was determined that no one in his kingdom should suffer from injustice.
          Though he may not have been the first that uttered the saying, “through justice
          a throne is established”, yet it was a maxim after his own heart.
          
         
        The wisdom of Solomon is also displayed to great
          advantage in another direction, namely, in his poetic productions. These were
          chiefly allegorical poems (Mashal); in them he caused the lofty cedars of
          Lebanon, and the lowly creeping wall plants, to appear as the emblems of what
          is highest and humblest; quadrupeds, birds of the air, reptiles, and even dumb
          fish are given voice and speech. Each of these fables probably ended with an
          appropriate moral lesson. It has been related that Solomon composed three thousand
          of such fables and five thousand songs or proverbs.
          
         
        But Solomon was by no means the originator of this
          style of fiction. Long before him such compositions had been common among the
          Israelites. Standing on Mount Gerizim, Jotham, the son of the Judge Gideon,
          addressed the misguided people of Shechem in an ingenious parable. The prophet
          Nathan had disguised his exhortation to David respecting his sin with Bathsheba
          in the form of a parable. But though not the inventor of this branch of poetry,
          Solomon is still deserving of praise for devoting the time left unoccupied by
          the cares of government to its further development. His rare qualities of mind
          were displayed in yet another direction. In some of his compositions he
          delineates types of persons and things by means of allusions, the hidden
          meaning of which is. left to guessing. Such enigmas, presented in a poetic
          form, were in those days the favourite diversions of social gatherings and
          feasts, and Solomon possessed remarkable ingenuity in devising these
          recreations of the human mind.
          
         
        He was, however, guilty of errors, the greater part of
          which arose from an exaggerated idea of his royal dignity, and from imitating
          the kings of the neighbouring states of Tyre and Egypt, with whom he was in
          constant intercourse. He claimed for himself a prerogative almost impious in a
          mortal, namely, that of being considered identical with the State,—all
          interests were to centre in him, and all else was to be of comparatively little
          importance. Solomon's wisdom ran aground on this rock. The truth of Samuel’s
          prediction, at the time of the election of a ruler, was better proven by the
          wise king than by his predecessors.
          
         
        Unfortunately Solomon was a younger son, to whom the
          throne had been allotted contrary to the ordinary laws of succession, whilst
          Adonijah, whom a portion of the people had recognised as king, was considered
          the rightful heir. So long as the latter lived, Solomon's government could not
          be on a firm basis, and he could never feel himself secure. Adonijah,
          therefore, had to be removed; the leader of the body guard, Benaiah, forcibly
          entered his house, and killed him. As an excuse for this act of violence, it was
          asserted that Adonijah had attempted to win the hand of Abishag, the young
          widow of David, and thus had revealed his traitorous intention of contesting
          his brother’s right to the throne. No sooner had he fallen than Joab, the
          former adherent of Adonijah, feared that a similar fate would overtake him.
          This exemplary general, who had contributed so considerably to the
          aggrandisement of the people of Israel and the power of the house of David,
          fled to the altar on Mount Zion, and clung to it, hoping to escape death.
          Benaiah, however, refused to respect his place of refuge, and shed his blood at
          the altar. In order to excuse this crime, it was given out that David himself,
          on his deathbed, had impressed on his successor the duty of revenging the death
          of Abner and Amasa. Joab, who had killed them in times of peace, was not to be
          allowed, in spite of his venerable age, to die in peace.
          
         
        It is uncertain whether Benaiah was Solomon’s evil
          adviser, or merely his instrument. Joab’s death was the cause of great joy
          amongst the enemies of Israel, and aroused in them the courage to plan a
          rebellion. Adonijah’s priestly partisan, Abiathar, whom Solomon did not dare
          touch, was deprived of his office as high priest, and Zadok was made the sole
          head of the priesthood, and his descendants, invested with that dignity,
          maintained it for over a thousand years, whilst the offspring of Abiathar were
          neglected.—The Benjamite Shimei, who had pursued David with execrations on
          his flight from Jerusalem, was also executed, and it was only through this
          threefold deed of blood that Solomon’s throne appears to have gained stability.
          
         
        Solomon then directed his attention to the formation
          of a court of the greatest magnificence, such as was befitting the powerful
          king whose commands were obeyed from the boundaries of Egypt to the banks of
          the Euphrates. In those days many wives were considered a necessary adjunct to
          the king’s dignity; David had about sixteen wives, but this was an
          insignificant number as compared with that of the kings of Egypt and Phoenicia,
          whom Solomon had taken for his pattern. It was only in compliance with this
          common but corrupt practice that Solomon formed an immense harem. His first
          wife was Naamah (the beautiful), an Ammonite princess; he also had other
          wives from the Moabite and Aramaean courts, and even from those of the Hittite
          and Caananite kings; but what most gratified his
          pride was that the Egyptian king Psusennes gave him
          his daughter in marriage. Solomon thought that in acting thus he had taken a
          wise step, and that his country and his dynasty would be benefited by the
          alliance. But the result proved the contrary. The daughter of Psusennes was naturally received with every mark of
          attention in the Israelitish capital; she became the first queen in Solomon's
          harem, but it seemed to him a disgrace that he could not place a magnificent
          palace at the disposal of this queen. What was the cedar palace built by David
          on Mount Zion, when compared with the gigantic edifices and labyrinthine
          palaces of the kings of Egypt? Solomon, therefore, determined to build a palace
          worthy of her.
          
         
        Through the alliance with Egypt, innovations of great
          consequence were made in Israel, among them the introduction of horses and
          chariots.
          
         
        Solomon also entered into close and friendly
          connection with Hiram, king of Tyre, with whom David had already established a
          neighbourly intimacy. He appears to have married a daughter of Hiram, too, and
          this close bond between Solomon and Hiram seems to have led to important and
          extensive undertakings.
          
         
        The establishment of a large harem demanded an immense
          body of servants. Solomon maintained a most brilliant court. The ambassadors of
          tributary and friendly powers had to be received with great pomp, for Solomon
          laid great stress on the display of splendour, and the maintenance of his court
          demanded the expenditure of large sums of money. As he could not otherwise
          obtain means, the royal house not having extensive estates in its own right,
          the people had to defray his enormous expenses. The whole land was divided into
          twelve parts, and a Governor was placed over each division to see that the
          inhabitants contributed one month’s provisions every year; the purpose of this
          division seems to have been that the old system of tribal organisation might
          cease. A superior, or Vizier, whose duty it was to see that the tribute of
          natural products was sent in regularly, was appointed over these twelve
          officials. Solomon displayed heightened grandeur in his buildings. He was
          anxious in the first instance to raise a splendid temple to the God of Israel
          in the capital of his country. It could not be a matter of indifference to him
          that in the neighbouring lands of Egypt and Phoenicia, with the rulers of which
          he was intimately acquainted, gigantic temples were raised for the various
          gods, whilst in his country the sanctuary was merely placed in a tent. Solomon,
          therefore, immediately after his accession to the throne, made preparations for
          commencing the erection of a sacred edifice; the site was already chosen. It
          was to be on Mount Moriah, to the north-east of the city, where David had
          raised an altar after the pestilence had ceased. Silver and gold had been
          collected for the purpose, but building materials, stones and cedar wood still
          had to be procured. Freestones and blocks had to be hewn from the rocks in the
          quarries north of Jerusalem, where they were so dovetailed as to be easily
          joined after reaching the spot. But whence procure workmen for this troublesome
          business of hewing, preparing and conveying the stones? Solomon had learnt from
          Pharaoh Psusennes, his father-in-law, the means of
          obtaining workmen without incurring heavy expense. He employed the remnant of
          the Canaanite population still living in the country. Although Saul had begun
          to decrease their numbers, he could not proceed against them with his full
          strength, on account of his continual strife with David. David had left them
          undisturbed, so that they lived quietly, mixed peaceably with the Israelites,
          and served the king faithfully in his wars against the Philistines and other
          nations. Solomon, on the contrary, declared the remnant of the Ammonites,
          Hittites, Perizzites and Hivites, as well as the Jebusites (whom David had
          permitted to live in the outskirts of Jerusalem), to be bondmen, and compelled
          them to perform the hardest labour. They numbered 150,000 youths and
          able-bodied men, and comprised the working class. More than 3,000
          Israelitish superintendents kept the enslaved natives to their work. A superior
          officer, Adoniram, watched over the superintendents and the workmen. Eighty
          thousand of these unhappy beings worked in the stone quarries day and night by
          the light of lamps. They were under the direction of a man from Biblos (Giblim), who understood
          the art of hewing heavy blocks from the rocks, and of giving the edges the
          necessary shape for dovetailing. Twenty thousand slaves removed the heavy
          blocks from the mouth of the quarry, and carried them to the building site.
          
         
        Hiram, the King of Tyre, Solomon’s friend, supplied
          cedar and cypress wood. The trees were felled on Lebanon, for which purpose
          Hiram placed skilled workmen at Solomon's disposal. The trunks were forwarded
          from Lebanon to Tyre or to the other harbours, whence they were conveyed in
          rafts to the port of Jaffa, and from there with much toil over hills and dales
          to Jerusalem, a distance of at least a ten hours’ journey. As the Canaanite
          slaves were not sufficiently numerous to remove the cedar and cypress trees,
          and to convey them to their destination, Solomon employed Israelites to assist
          in the work, thirty thousand being impressed for the duty. Each ten thousand
          were sent for a month to work in the forests, to fell the trees, and convey
          them to their destination. After a month had passed, the workmen were relieved
          by another body of ten thousand. These thirty thousand Israelites were not
          enslaved—they remained free, and even received wages—but they were not allowed
          to withdraw voluntarily from the work.
          
         
        It was not to be expected that Hiram would cut down
          his cedar and cypress forests, or that he would place carpenters and builders
          at Solomon’s disposal without receiving some return. So long as the buildings
          were in course of erection, Solomon sent him annually a certain amount of corn,
          wine and oil, with the raising of which tribute the people were probably taxed.
          But Hiram was also obliged to advance gold for the adornment of the interior of
          the temple. Solomon’s fleet had not yet imported the precious metal. In return
          for the supply of gold, Solomon yielded up to Hiram twenty towns of the
          borderland, in the tribe of Asher, between Phoenicia and the territory of
          Israel. Though these were not important, and did not please Hiram, still it was
          a transference of Israelitish territory to the Phoenicians. Hiram permitted
          various races to colonise the towns, from whom the territory received the name
          “Gelil Haggoyim” (the
          district of nations), later Galilee. As soon as the stones and blocks of wood
          had been removed to the building site of the temple, the erection of which was
          to occupy three years, the work was commenced.
          
         
        The temple was built of freestone, and the walls were
          covered with cedar planks on the inside. On these were traced designs of palms,
          open flower cups, and cherubim (winged heads with human faces), and these
          designs were inlaid with gold. The temple was sixty cubits long, twenty cubits
          wide, and thirty cubits high. It was divided into the Holy of Holies (Debir,
          the inner chamber, a square of twenty cubits), and the Holy Place (Hechal, which was forty cubits long). The Holy of Holies
          seems to have been situated on higher ground than the sanctuary. At the sides
          were two cherubim of gilded olive wood, each ten cubits high, the wings of
          which were five cubits wide. At the entrance of the sanctuary was an open
          vestibule (Ulam), which was of the same width as the sanctuary, and ten cubits
          in length, and in front of this hall there were artistically wrought columns of
          bronze. The artist, Hiram, was a half-Jew, his father being a Syrian and his
          mother a Naphtalite. The Holy of Holies was to face
          the west, contrary to the custom of the Gentiles, whose temples faced the
          rising sun; the gates were of olive wood, adorned with gilded cherubim as well
          as with palms and flower-cups. The folding doors of the sanctuary, made of
          cypress wood, were ornamented in a like manner, and the floor was of cypress
          wood inlaid with gold. In the Holy of Holies nothing was visible but the
          cherubim, intended to enshrine the ark of the covenant, in which the tablets of
          the law were kept. In the sanctuary there was an altar of cedar wood gilded on
          all sides, with five gilded candlesticks at each side, and a large gilded table
          for twelve loaves. The temple was surrounded by an extensive courtyard. Inside
          the vestibule stood a large iron altar, and a spacious water reservoir, called
          the “iron sea”, adorned with a border of open flower-cups and lily-buds, and on
          the lower part with colocynths. This reservoir was supported by twelve iron
          bulls, each three of which turned in a different direction. The water was
          intended for washing the hands and feet of the officiating priests whenever
          they entered the sanctuary, the flow of water probably being regulated by a
          faucet. Ten small basins on wheels, artistically engraved, could be pushed to
          any spot where they might be wanted. Vessels for the sacrificial rites were
          cast in large quantities by the order of the king. The whole building inside
          and outside was stamped with the impress of wealth and grandeur. At the
          completion of the building, it was consecrated (1007) with solemn
          rites. The erection of the temple had occupied seven years, and the month
          selected for the consecration was that in which the harvest and the vintage
          were completed. The chiefs of all the tribes and the elders of families were
          invited, and people streamed from every quarter to gaze in astonishment at the
          splendours of the temple, and to look upon the unaccustomed spectacle.
          
         
        The solemnities commenced with the transfer of the ark
          from Mount Zion, the town of David, to Mount Moriah. The bars attached to the
          ark were those which had been used during the wanderings in the desert. They
          were so placed that all present could see that holy relic of past ages, the two
          stone tables inscribed with the ten commandments. During the transfer of the
          ark of the covenant, and during the consecration, many thousands of sacrifices
          were offered, and also psalms were sung. No sooner had the ark of the covenant
          been brought into the Holy of Holies than a thick cloud filled the body of the
          temple, so that the Aaronites were interrupted in their service. This was
          considered a token of God's mercy, and a sign that the consecration had been
          performed in accordance with His will. The vast assembly was thus swayed by the
          feelings of joy, piety and devotion. The king gave expression to the general
          sentiments in a few grave words: “God has promised to dwell in a cloud. I have
          built a dwelling for thee, O God—an abode for thee to dwell in for ever”. Mount
          Moriah thus appeared like Mount Sinai, where the voice of God had spoken from
          out of a dense cloud. The temple became an object of veneration to the people,
          who believed that from between the two cherubim, God would make known to them
          the ways in which they were to walk. A prophet who was present (perhaps Ahijah
          of Shiloh) announced to King Solomon in the name of God, “If thou wilt walk in
          my law, and obey my commands, and fulfil my behests, then I will fulfil unto
          thee the promise I made unto David, thy father—I shall dwell in the midst
          of the sons of Israel, and I will not desert my people”.
          
         
        The nation celebrated the autumn festivals, which
          occurred simultaneously with the consecration, most joyfully. Deep and lasting
          was the impression made by this temple, gleaming with gold and bronze,
          sumptuous and imposing in its structure, containing no visible image of the
          Deity, yet filled with His invisible presence. The house of God offered
          something tangible to those whose imaginations could not conceive of the
          spiritual, divested of material form. The temple was the pride and strength of
          Israel, and the delight of its eyes. At the time of the consecration there was
          inaugurated a religious service, such as had been impossible within the narrow
          limits of the sanctuary in Shiloh or, during the transition period, in the tent
          at Zion. A priesthood had certainly existed even in former times, and belonged
          exclusively to the descendants of Aaron. It was, however, only under Solomon
          that a high priest was put at the head of the others, and that gradations in
          rank were introduced. Azariah, the son of Zadok, was advanced to the office of
          high priest after the death of his father, and was assisted by the inferior
          priests. A new order of service was arranged for the Levites, who
          were subordinate to the priests: A part of them assisted at the sacrificial services.
          Another part kept guard at four sides of the temple, and were charged with the
          care of the sacred vessels, and with all preparations for the temple service.
          Lastly, certain families took part in the singing and the instrumental music
          that accompanied the services. It was the temple and the new order of worship
          introduced there that actually raised Jerusalem to the position of the capital
          of the country. Pilgrims from all the tribes attended the autumnal festivals
          there, in order to witness the solemn divine services, such as could be held at
          no tribal altar. Jerusalem gradually becoming an important commercial town, in
          which foreign goods and curiosities were displayed, attracted ever greater
          numbers of visitors from all the tribes. Thus the youngest of the cities in the
          land of Israel surpassed and outshone all the older towns. Solomon gave orders
          that the capital be fortified on all sides, and that the temple also be
          included within the line of fortifications.
          
         
        The erection of the royal palace occupied a period of
          more than thirteen years. It consisted of a series of buildings which extended
          over a great area on the northern hill, in the quarter called Millo. Next to
          the entrance was the House of the Forest of Lebanon, which took its name from
          the numerous pillars of cedar, which were ranged in rows of fifteen each. This
          house served as the Armoury for the king’s protection. Here thirteen hundred
          guards kept watch; they were provided with spears and shields of gold, and
          acted as the king’s attendants when he proceeded to the temple. Great attention
          was given by Solomon to the fitting up of the Judgment or Throne Chamber. The
          walls from the floor to the ceiling were covered with cedar wood, and adorned
          with gold fretwork. In this hall Solomon’s throne was placed. It was considered
          a marvel of workmanship. It was ornamented with ivory, and inlaid with gold.
          Six steps led up to it, and on each step were two artistically wrought lions,
          the symbols of power and of royal dignity. The seat was supported on each side
          by arms, and on it also were two lions. In the hall of public justice Solomon
          heard contesting parties, and pronounced judgment: he considered his office of
          judge one of the holiest and most important connected with his kingly dignity.
          Here he also received the ambassadors of the various countries, who attended
          his court to offer their homage, or to negotiate new treaties. A special palace
          was built for the king, his servants and his wives, a separate house being
          reserved for the Egyptian princess. It appears that her removal from David's
          house to her own residence was effected with great pomp. Probably Solomon had
          also an aqueduct built so as to supply the town of Jerusalem and the temple
          with water from the rich spring of Etam, which was at a two hours' journey from
          Jerusalem.
          
         
        The practice of building splendid edifices of cedar
          was not confined to Solomon; the great nobles and princes who lived in
          Jerusalem, the high officers, and his favourites, all followed his example.
          With the wealth that streamed into the land through the opening of three
          important channels, the love of show, which spread from the king to the higher
          classes, could be freely gratified. Phoenician merchants of high standing, who
          carried on a large wholesale trade, money-changers, men of wealth who lent money
          on interest, now settled in Jerusalem. They composed a special corporation or
          guild, and were under the protection of the treaty between Solomon and Hiram.
          They were permitted to live according to their own laws, and were even allowed
          to practise their religious or, rather, idolatrous rites. The three great
          sources of wealth were the Powerful
          Position of the State, the Alliance with Egypt, and
          the Indian Trade. Those princes who had entered into treaties
          with David confirmed them with his successor, and other potentates sought his
          friendship. On swearing allegiance, all these princes and nations sent the
          customary tribute and rich gifts, such as gold and silver vessels, valuable
          garments, spices, horses and mules. The alliance with Egypt was also the source
          of considerable additions to the national wealth, as that kingdom furnished
          horses to the mountainous districts, and war chariots, which were in great
          demand in foreign parts. The princes of Aram and of the territories on the
          Euphrates who had formerly procured their horses and chariots from Egypt, were
          to buy these war materials from Solomon’s merchant guild. The latter
          established a station for his own riders and horses on the plain not far from
          the sea. He kept twelve thousand horses and fourteen hundred war chariots (each
          drawn by two horses), and for these he erected spacious buildings, containing
          four thousand stalls. Solomon’s greatest gains, however, were acquired in trade
          with India. To the Phoenicians the journey to this distant country was attended
          with insuperable difficulties, so long as the country near the Red Sea was
          rendered unsafe by the uncivilised and predatory bands that dwelt there. By his
          alliance with Hiram, Solomon had opened up a safer and nearer route to India.
          The strip of land extending from the southern border of Judah to the eastern
          coast of the Red Sea, the Points Elath and Eziongeber,
          had been rendered accessible. The caravans with their loaded camels could
          proceed in safety from Jerusalem and from the coast to the northern point of
          the Red Sea. At Hiram's suggestion, Solomon had a fleet of strong and large
          ships (ships of Tarshish) built, and equipped on the coast at Eziongeber. Hiram sent his most skilful sailors, who knew
          the route thoroughly, to man the vessels. Israelites of the tribes of Asher and
          Zebulun, who lived on the coast and were acquainted with the sea, were also
          employed.
          
         
        When the Israelitish fleet was complete, it sailed out
          of the harbour of Eziongeber to the Red Sea, which
          separates Palestine from Egypt, Nubia, and Abyssinia, and proceeded along the
          coast to the Gulf which washes the shores of Southern Arabia, as far as the
          mouth of the Indus, in the land of Ophir (now called Scinde). After a period of
          two years, Solomon’s fleet returned richly laden with the proceeds of this
          first expedition. Vast droves of camels carried the treasures to Jerusalem, to
          the great astonishment of the whole population. More than four hundred talents
          (kikhar) of gold, silver in great quantities, ivory,
          ebony, apes, and exquisitely coloured peacocks, sandal-wood, and sweet-smelling
          plants were thus transported. Solomon caused a throne to be made of the ivory,
          and the sandal-wood was used for ornamenting the harps and lutes of the
          musicians who played in the temple. The palings of the bridge which led from
          the palace to the temple were also made of this rare and costly wood. Solomon
          sent his fleet several times to Ophir or India, and each time new riches and
          curiosities were brought into the country. The port Elath became a place of
          great importance. Judaeans settled there, and the land of Israel thus extended
          from the extreme end of the Red Sea to the Euphrates. In order to convey horses
          and chariots from Aramaea to the Euphrates, as also
          the various importations from Phoenicia, roads had to be made, and measures
          taken to ensure the safety of the caravans. In a mountainous country it is not
          easy for beasts of burden, and certainly not for horses and chariots, to
          traverse great distances, obstructed as the way is by steep cliffs, abrupt
          precipices, and masses of rolling stones. Solomon, however, had roads made
          which led from Jerusalem to the north; these were
          the king’s high-roads.
          
         
        He probably employed the services of the Canaanite
          natives, who were obliged as bondmen to take part in this work. Heights were
          levelled, depths filled up, and stones removed. The roads were passable by
          carriages, which could proceed without hindrance from the south to the north,
          and the caravans passing from the Jordan to the sea could travel without
          difficulty. A chain of fortresses protected the roadways, and served as resting
          places. Besides these stations for riders and carriages, Solomon also founded towns
          for storing goods; these were also used to house grain for future years of
          scarcity.
          
         
        Thus Solomon settled the affairs of Israel, and
          provided for its future security. He had no sharp-sighted counsellor, such as
          David had had in Ahithophel, to assist him in establishing order; his own
          wisdom was his sole counsellor. But he had to choose responsible officers, who
          would give effect to his instructions, and carry out the plans which he
          devised. The great extent of his state and his court demanded the establishment
          of new offices. For the better reception of strangers he had placed over his vast
          household a majordomo (al-hab-Baith).
          Ahishar was the name of this officer. The twelve officials who provided for the
          wants of the household were supervised by a chief whose name was
          Azariah-ben-Nathan. A high official, Adoniram, the son of Abda, was also placed
          (al-ham-Mas) over the many thousand bondmen who worked on the roads and in the
          fortresses. Thus three high posts were newly created by Solomon.
          
         
        Its great extent and the riches which Solomon had
          amassed enabled the kingdom of Israel to hold its place amongst the greatest
          nations in the ancient world. Princes and nations who lived in strife with each
          other sought the aid of the ruler of this mighty dominion, and called upon him
          to act as arbitrator, for his wisdom was famed far and wide. The greatest
          blessing in Solomon’s reign was the peace and undisturbed quiet which obtained
          throughout the land. From Dan unto Beersheba the Israelites could peacefully
          enjoy their home, “everyone under his own vine and under his own fig-tree”.
          
         
        The commercial treaties, the prosperity of the
          country, the security to life arising from the long peace maintained in
          Solomon’s reign, all contributed to attract the surrounding tribes of Moabites,
          Ammonites, Idumaeans, and even Egyptians to the country. It is probable, too,
          that the high religious culture of the Israelites, so superior to idolatry, and
          its splendid manifestation in the temple at Jerusalem influenced enlightened
          foreigners to seek shelter under the “wings of the God of Israel”. The country,
          the people, and the God of Israel acquired widespread renown in Solomon's time.
          The Israelitish mariners, who visited so many harbours, coast-lands, and marts,
          and the Israelitish merchants who entered into connections with foreign parts
          carried reports of their fatherland to the remotest climes and nations. The
          praise of the wise, mighty, and brilliant king Solomon resounded far and wide
          in his times. In the eyes of the world he elevated the name of the God whom he
          honoured, and to whose glory he had erected a magnificent temple. The
          Israelitish sailors and merchants unconsciously became the first messengers and
          pioneers of the religion of Israel among the idolatrous nations.
          
         
        One day Jerusalem was surprised by an extraordinary
          embassy. A wise queen, from the spice-bearing land of Sabia (Sheba), which is
          situated on the Arabian coast of the Red Sea, came to visit Jerusalem. As she
          had heard so much of the greatness of Solomon, and in praise of the God of
          Israel, she wished to see, with her own eyes, how much truth or falsehood lay
          in the reports which had come to her ears. She was received with marked
          attention by Solomon, and had many interviews with him. The queen (whom tradition
          calls Belkis) greatly admired his wisdom, and was much impressed by the temple
          which he had erected to God, and by the brilliancy of his court. It is said
          that she propounded enigmatic riddles to him in order to test his powers, and
          these he answered in a manner which excited her astonishment.
          
         
        Solomon’s brilliant rule, however, became the source
          of a serious division between the tribes, which he had unavailingly striven to
          consolidate into one indissoluble whole. Notwithstanding that the temple formed
          a bond of union for the whole people, and that Solomon tried to abolish the
          tribal isolation which prevailed, he succeeded only in the case of Benjamin,
          which became more closely united with Judah. This was owing to the fact that
          the temple was built on Benjamite territory, and consequently several Benjamite
          families settled in the capital. Probably Solomon also preferred the tribe of
          Benjamin and his own ancestral tribe to the other tribes. The mutual dislike of
          the houses of Israel and Judah, or the northern and southern tribes, had not
          ceased. Among the northern tribes a deep sense of discontent prevailed against
          Solomon, despite the prosperity to which he had raised them; they resented the
          pressure put upon them to forward regular supplies for the court, and to
          perform compulsory service in the erection of public buildings. Their
          discontent was not expressed aloud, but it needed only an occasion for it to
          vent itself. Wise as Solomon was, he had not sufficient foresight to perceive
          that his faults were sure to weaken the future security of the state. Amongst
          the officials whom Solomon employed to supervise the buildings was an
          Ephraimite, who was clever, courageous and ambitious. This was Jeroboam, the
          son of Nebat, from the town of Zereda or Zorathan, on
          the other side of the Jordan. He was the son of a widow; thus, free from
          paternal restraint, he could follow out his own impulses uncontrolled. Jeroboam
          had supervised the erection of the walls of Jerusalem, and had displayed great
          skill and firmness in managing the bondmen. Solomon was, in fact, so well
          pleased with him that he bestowed on him a high position in the territory of
          Ephraim and Manasseh. Here Jeroboam had the opportunity of becoming acquainted
          with the discontent of the people, which was probably strongest amongst the
          ever-discontented Ephraimites. The popular feeling accorded well with his
          ambitious plans, and he decided to utilise it when a favourable
          opportunity should occur.
          
         
        Solomon was guilty of the folly of permitting
          sacrificial altars to be built for various idols. It may have been his foreign
          wives who induced him to make this concession, or perhaps it was due to the
          foreigners, the Phoenicians and other races, who had taken up their residence
          in Jerusalem, and had received permission to worship their gods in the land of
          Israel according to their custom. However this may have been, altars were
          raised on the high northern point of the Mount of Olives, in honour of Astarte
          of the Zidonians, Milcom of the Ammonites, Chemosh of the Moabites, and other
          idols. The religious convictions of the nation were not so deeply rooted that
          the people could witness all kinds of idolatrous practices without falling into
          the errors of idol-worship themselves. A prophet, Ahijah of Shiloh, had the
          courage to reprimand the king, and to warn him of the danger which his conduct
          rendered imminent. Solomon, however, seems to have given little heed to his
          representations, and the prophet, indignant at the king’s obtuseness,
          determined to use Jeroboam (whose ambitious schemes he had probably divined)
          as the instrument of Solomon’s destruction. When Jeroboam left Jerusalem, the
          prophet approached him, seized his garment, tore it into twelve pieces, and
          handing him ten of them, he said, “Take these ten pieces; they portray the ten
          tribes which will separate themselves from the house of David, and recognise
          thee as their king”. Jeroboam wanted no further encouragement to mature his
          plans, since a prophet had commended them. He hurried to the territories of
          Ephraim, and called on the Ephraimites to separate themselves from the house of
          David. Meanwhile Solomon had received tidings of the event, and before the
          revolution could spread, he sent his guards to kill the rebel. Jeroboam then
          fled to Egypt, where a new dynasty now occupied the throne. Shishak (Sheshenk, Sesonchosis, 980-959)
          was the first king of the new line. Under his rule was severed the bond which
          had united Israel and Egypt since Solomon’s marriage with the Egyptian
          princess. Shishak in fact was inimical to the Israelitish nation, which had
          become more powerful than was agreeable to him. He therefore received Jeroboam
          with kindness, intending to use him against Solomon. Shishak also gave a friendly
          reception and protection to an Idumaean prince, who had special reasons for
          avenging himself on the Israelitish nation. Hadad (or Adad) was a relation of
          the Idumaean king whom David had conquered. He had, when a boy, escaped the
          massacre ordered by Joab in consequence of a revolution in Idumaea.
          When Shishak ascended the throne, the Idumaean prince hurried to Egypt, and was
          graciously received. Shishak gave him the queen’s sister in marriage, and his
          first-born son Genubath) grew up among the Egyptian princes. Hadad also
          acquired possessions in Egypt, and was honoured in every way; notwithstanding
          this, he yearned to return to Edom, and to regain the territories which had
          been snatched away from him. He carried this desire into effect with the aid
          of Shishak, who was fully aware that the warlike spirit which had obtained
          under David and Joab, had diminished under Solomon’s peaceful rule, and that
          petty warfare in the mountainous districts would be connected with little
          danger, while it might be productive of great benefit to himself. Hadad and the
          troops which he had mustered in Idumaea did great
          damage to Solomon’s caravans, which carried goods between the bay of Elath and
          the Israelitish boundaries; and Solomon’s warriors were powerless to prevent
          these attacks.
          
         
        Unnoticed by Solomon, another cloud, which threatened
          Israel with destruction, was gathering in the north. Rezon (of Zobah), one of
          the servants of King Hadadezer, whom David had overthrown, had taken to flight
          after the defeat of his sovereign; he assembled a predatory troop, and made
          raids in the districts lying between the Euphrates and the northern ranges of
          the Lebanon. Rezon’s troops gradually increased in numbers, and with their
          numbers grew his courage and power. At last he ventured to proceed against the
          ancient city of Damascus. He succeeded in capturing it and in having himself
          chosen king. Advancing from the north, Rezon also committed hostilities against
          the Israelites and their allies, without any opposition on the part of Solomon,
          who either had a dislike of war, or had no troops available to ward off the
          attacks from the north and the south. Thus arose, from small beginnings, powers
          inimical to Israel, which might easily have been nipped in the bud. Besides
          this, an internal breach was in store for Israel.
          
         
        Solomon, however, did not live to see the development
          of the impending evils and the decay of his kingdom. He died in peace at the
          age of about sixty years (in 977). His body was buried, no doubt with great
          pomp, in the rocky mausoleum of the kings which David had built on the south of
          Mount Zion. It was said later on that Solomon, as well as his father, had
          heaped up untold treasures and wealth in these vaults and cells, which were
          discovered many centuries after by the later Jewish kings.
          
         
        Although Solomon had numerous wives, it appears that
          he left but few children, a son named Rehoboam and two daughters, Taphath and
          Basmath, whom their father married to two of his officers. Posterity, which has
          greatly exaggerated Solomon’s wisdom and ability, has also attributed to him
          power over mystic spirits and demons, who, obeying his will, could be invoked
          or dismissed as he chose. Even a ring on which his name was engraven was supposed to exercise a mighty spell over the demons, and keep them in subjection.
          
         
        The power to which Solomon had elevated Israel
          resembled that of a magic world built up by spirits. The spell was broken at
          his death.
          
         
         
        
           |